peer review sheet for argumentative essay

English Current

ESL Lesson Plans, Tests, & Ideas

• North American Idioms
• Business Idioms
• Idioms Quiz
• Idiom Requests
• Proverbs Quiz & List
• Phrasal Verbs Quiz
• Basic Phrasal Verbs
• North American Idioms App
• A(n)/The: Help Understanding Articles
• The First & Second Conditional
• The Difference between 'So' & 'Too'
• The Difference between 'a few/few/a little/little'
• The Difference between "Other" & "Another"
• Check Your Level
• English Vocabulary
• Verb Tenses (Intermediate)
• Articles (A, An, The) Exercises
• Prepositions Exercises
• Irregular Verb Exercises
• Gerunds & Infinitives Exercises
• Discussion Questions
• Speech Topics
• Argumentative Essay Topics
• Top-rated Lessons
• Intermediate
• Upper-Intermediate
• Reading Lessons
• View Topic List
• Expressions for Everyday Situations
• Travel Agency Activity
• Present Progressive with Mr. Bean
• Work-related Idioms
• Adjectives to Describe Employees
• Writing for Tone, Tact, and Diplomacy
• Speaking Tactfully
• Advice on Monetizing an ESL Website
• Teaching your First Conversation Class
• How to Teach English Conversation
• Teaching Different Levels
• Teaching Grammar in Conversation Class
• Members' Home
• Update Billing Info.
• Cancel Subscription
• North American Proverbs Quiz & List
• North American Idioms Quiz
• Idioms App (Android)
• 'Be used to'" / 'Use to' / 'Get used to'
• Ergative Verbs and the Passive Voice
• Keywords & Verb Tense Exercises
• Irregular Verb List & Exercises
• Non-Progressive (State) Verbs
• Present Perfect vs. Past Simple
• Present Simple vs. Present Progressive
• Past Perfect vs. Past Simple
• Subject Verb Agreement
• The Passive Voice
• Subject & Object Relative Pronouns
• Relative Pronouns Where/When/Whose
• Commas in Adjective Clauses
• A/An and Word Sounds
• 'The' with Names of Places
• Understanding English Articles
• Article Exercises (All Levels)
• Yes/No Questions
• Wh-Questions
• How far vs. How long
• Affect vs. Effect
• A few vs. few / a little vs. little
• Boring vs. Bored
• Compliment vs. Complement
• Die vs. Dead vs. Death
• Expect vs. Suspect
• Experiences vs. Experience
• Go home vs. Go to home
• Had better vs. have to/must
• Have to vs. Have got to
• I.e. vs. E.g.
• In accordance with vs. According to
• Lay vs. Lie
• Make vs. Do
• In the meantime vs. Meanwhile
• Need vs. Require
• Notice vs. Note
• 'Other' vs 'Another'
• Pain vs. Painful vs. In Pain
• Raise vs. Rise
• So vs. Such
• So vs. So that
• Some vs. Some of / Most vs. Most of
• Sometimes vs. Sometime
• Too vs. Either vs. Neither
• Weary vs. Wary
• Who vs. Whom
• While vs. During
• While vs. When
• Wish vs. Hope
• 10 Common Writing Mistakes
• 34 Common English Mistakes
• First & Second Conditionals
• Comparative & Superlative Adjectives
• Determiners: This/That/These/Those
• Check Your English Level
• Grammar Quiz (Advanced)
• Vocabulary Test - Multiple Questions
• Vocabulary Quiz - Choose the Word
• Verb Tense Review (Intermediate)
• Verb Tense Exercises (All Levels)
• Conjunction Exercises
• List of Topics
• Business English
• Games for the ESL Classroom
• Pronunciation
• Teaching Your First Conversation Class
• How to Teach English Conversation Class

Argumentative Essay Peer-Editing Checklist

I use the below checklist with my students so they can improve the drafts of their argumentative essays . Feel free to use it (or edit it as long as you don't redistribute it) if you find it useful for your class.  Note that there are APA-related questions.

There are two pages. The first page is for the prepared students who brought an essay draft to class to show their partners. The second page is for unprepared students who only have their essay in their heads (it's a verbal exercise). If your students are all prepared, then you can disregard the second page.

Peer-review Checklist Preview

Argumentative Essay Draft Peer-Editing Checklist

Pair-work : Answer the below questions based on your partner’s essay.

• The essay has a clear thesis statement presenting its stance at the end of the introduction paragraph. (YES/NO) If YES, write the essay’s thesis statement below:
• The essay presents a counter-argument to the author’s stance. (YES/NO) If YES, write the counter-argument points below:
• Can you easily find a refutation or response to each of the above points?

Point A: (YES/NO)

Point B: (YES/NO)

(Point C: (YES/NO))

• If YES, is the refutation persuasive? (YES/Somewhat/No)
• Does the essay ignore any obvious counter-arguments? (YES/NO) (Answer should be NO)
• Do the regular body paragraphs begin with a clear topic sentence that states the overall topic of the paragraph? (Example topic sentence: “ Furthermore, outsourcing can reduce company costs .” < If this were the topic sentence, then the whole paragraph would be about reducing costs.) (YES/NO)
• Does each paragraph have at least three sentences? (YES/NO)

If time allows…

• Does each in-text citation contain the author’s last name and the year of publication? (YES/NO)
• Count the number of authors cited. Do all of these authors appear in the References? (YES/NO)
• Are there any non-cited authors in the References? (YES/NO) (Answer should be NO)
• Are the References entries listed in alphabetical order?
• Do all sources accessed online have a DOI or URL?
• Are the sentences clear? Highlight the sentences you don’t understand.

Research Essay Worksheet – Verbal Explanation (Essay draft not Ready)

Part 1 (Pair Work) : Stance, Counter-argument, and Refutation

Present the below points to your partner about your essay. You do not need to write anything–explain it as clearly as possible verbally.

Stance/Thesis

• My essay argues that ….

Counter-argument

• Critics of this view argue that (1) ….
• Some people also might argue that (2) ….

Refutation/Response

• Point #1 is not (completely) true because ….
• Point #2 is not (completely) true because ….

Part 2 : Once finished, give feedback to each other. Consider the following points:

• Are the most obvious counter-arguments mentioned?
• Does the refutation address the specific points of the counter-argument?
• Is the refutation convincing

Part 3 : (Time Permitting) Verification of peer-reviewed sources

Paste a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources that you plan to use below.

Confirm with your partner that these sources are peer-reviewed, i.e. journal articles or published books.

Best of luck with your classes.

-- Peer-editing worksheet created by Matthew Barton (copyright) for Englishcurrent.com

EnglishCurrent is happily hosted on Dreamhost . If you found this page helpful, consider a donation to our hosting bill to show your support!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• High School
• You don't have any recent items yet.
• You don't have any courses yet.
• You don't have any books yet.
• You don't have any Studylists yet.
• Information

Persuasive Essay Peer Review Worksheet

21st century skills: critical thinking and problem solving (phi-105), grand canyon university, recommended for you.

Students also viewed

• PHI105 T3 Thesis Statement and Gathering Resources Worksheet
• PHI105 T2 Brainstorming Worksheet JFeliciano-Uribe
• PHI105 T1 Persuasive Essay Topic
• Abortion Essay
• Karis assignment - this was an essay of week 6

Related documents

• Reflection assignment for PHI 105
• Sharon - Persuasive essay, 150 words, seventh edition APA style. Received a perfect grade
• PHI105 T2 Brainstorming Worksheet 12 8 2020
• Week 5 Language Assignment
• PHI105 21st Century Skills

Preview text

Persuasive essay: peer review worksheet, part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing, skills. this worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within, .the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft, name of the draft’s author: saylor frew, name of the peer reviewer: mackenzie malone, after reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. this should include the stance and the three, .sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. do not place your own critique of the essay within this space, evaluate the essay, after a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the persuasive essay: final draft rubric below. determine the level, of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (level of achievement ranges from unsatisfactory to excellent and are found, at the top of the rubric. assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). please use the highlighting tool to score your, .peer within each criteria. then use the right hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score, internet censorship happens every single day to billions of people throughout the world. internet censorship usually, occurs on media platforms like instagram and google. it’s the act of a post being removed, blocked, or banned. the use of, internet censorship should be illegal in the united states. it silences individuals views on vaccinations, gives too much, .authority to one group of people, and goes against the right to free speech, topic 7 rubric: persuasive essay: final draft, unsatisfactory, satisfactory, why was this score determined for excellent, your peer’s essay what, evidence/examples do you have for, this score.

100% 85% 75% 65% 0% Scaling %

Content – 70%

Objective Perspective and Position

Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s .own

Appropriately identifies one’s own position on the topic. Vague explanation of the position is given. Little reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position completely appeals to emotion instead .of reason

Appropriately identifies one’s position on the topic. Explains the position taken in a coherent way. Sound reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position mostly appeals to emotion instead of .reason

Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Clearly explains the position taken. Sound and detailed reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position appeals mostly to .reason

Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Comprehensively explains the position taken. Specific issues related to the topic are fully presented in great detail. Position appeals to .reason

Rationale for score: This paper properly states the stance that it will take and explains it. It also presents related and specific issues .throughout the essay

Word count is less Word Count than half the minimum or more than double the .maximum

Body of essay is more than 100 words over or under the word .count

Body of essay is more than 50 but less than 100 words over or under the word .count

Body of essay is over or under the word count by 50 .words or less

Within the appropriate word .count

Rationale for score: I determined this score because the essay stayed between the word count guidelines of 750-1,000 words. This .essay has a total of 880 words

Adheres to principles of critical thinking Manage emotions and avoid fallacies. Logical reasoning is used within arguments Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulative Acknowledge other perspectives and evaluate assumptions about the topic.

Fails to adhere to almost all principles of .critical thinking

Adheres to few principles of .critical thinking

Adheres to some principles of critical thinking on .a surface level

Adheres to many principles of critical thinking. Use of the principles is clear .to see

Adheres to most of the principles of critical thinking. Attempts to incorporate each one in a logical and fluid way

Rationale for score: The principals of critical thinking are used appropriately throughout this essay. The essay provides logical reasoning with its arguments, keeps a persuasive tone, and discusses other perspectives while still presenting a good .argument for their stance

Organization and Effectiveness – 25%

Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is not stated .in the conclusion

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis is not stated in the .conclusion

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is not stated in the .conclusion

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is stated within the concluding paragraph

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Thesis is clearly restated .in the conclusion

Rationale for score: The thesis was done perfectly. The thesis statement not only introduced the topic that was being discussed, but it also stated the stance that was being taken and the three supporting arguments. The one thing that I would personally change is that the thesis statement in the first paragraph and the restates thesis statement in the conclusion are the exact .same

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are .used

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Essay is primarily written in first and second person

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience- appropriate language are used. Essay is written with third person voice with some instances of first or .second person

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Essay is mostly written with third .person voice

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Essay is written with third person .voice

Rationale for score: The essay is free of mechanical errors and is written in a variety of sentence structures. However, it is not fully written in third person. The word “you” (second person) was used a couple of times in .the paper

Format – 5%

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and (assignment

APA template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely .followed correctly

APA template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is .apparent

APA template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors .may be present

APA template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in .formatting style

All format elements are .correct

Rationale for score: The format was done correctly in regards to using the APA format template, but the essay does not stay in the .third person point of view

Research Citations In-text ) citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment (and style

No reference page is included. No .citations are used

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently .used

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be .present

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is .usually correct

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is .free of error

Rationale for score: The in-text citations are correct, the reference page is on a separate page and in alphabetical order, and paraphrasing is correct. However, the first reference on the reference page needs to have the DOI indented with the rest of the reference and the text color needs to be .changed to black

Overall Feedback

.feedback to your peer should be objective and useful, :three strengths of the paper are, .the thesis statement clearly states the topic, stance, and the three supporting subtopics 1(, .staying between the word count guidelines 2(, .using the apa template and following the guidelines 3(, :three things that could be improved are, .remaining in the 3rd person throughout the entire essay 1(, .the reference page 2(, .the thesis statement in the first paragraph and the restated thesis statement in the conclusion are the exact same 3(.

• Multiple Choice

Course : 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving (PHI-105)

University : grand canyon university.

• Discover more from: 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PHI-105 Grand Canyon University 999+   Documents Go to course
• More from: 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PHI-105 Grand Canyon University 999+   Documents Go to course