An official website of the United States government
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
- Publications
- Account settings
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
Types of Variables, Descriptive Statistics, and Sample Size
Feroze kaliyadan, vinay kulkarni.
- Author information
- Article notes
- Copyright and License information
Address for correspondence: Dr. Feroze Kaliyadan, Department of Dermatology, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected]
Received 2018 Dec; Accepted 2018 Dec.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This short “snippet” covers three important aspects related to statistics – the concept of variables , the importance, and practical aspects related to descriptive statistics and issues related to sampling – types of sampling and sample size estimation.
Keywords: Biostatistics , descriptive statistics , sample size , variables
What is a variable?[ 1 , 2 ] To put it in very simple terms, a variable is an entity whose value varies. A variable is an essential component of any statistical data. It is a feature of a member of a given sample or population, which is unique, and can differ in quantity or quantity from another member of the same sample or population. Variables either are the primary quantities of interest or act as practical substitutes for the same. The importance of variables is that they help in operationalization of concepts for data collection. For example, if you want to do an experiment based on the severity of urticaria, one option would be to measure the severity using a scale to grade severity of itching. This becomes an operational variable. For a variable to be “good,” it needs to have some properties such as good reliability and validity, low bias, feasibility/practicality, low cost, objectivity, clarity, and acceptance. Variables can be classified into various ways as discussed below.
Quantitative vs qualitative
A variable can collect either qualitative or quantitative data. A variable differing in quantity is called a quantitative variable (e.g., weight of a group of patients), whereas a variable differing in quality is called a qualitative variable (e.g., the Fitzpatrick skin type)
A simple test which can be used to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative variables is the subtraction test. If you can subtract the value of one variable from the other to get a meaningful result, then you are dealing with a quantitative variable (this of course will not apply to rating scales/ranks).
Quantitative variables can be either discrete or continuous
Discrete variables are variables in which no values may be assumed between the two given values (e.g., number of lesions in each patient in a sample of patients with urticaria).
Continuous variables, on the other hand, can take any value in between the two given values (e.g., duration for which the weals last in the same sample of patients with urticaria). One way of differentiating between continuous and discrete variables is to use the “mid-way” test. If, for every pair of values of a variable, a value exactly mid-way between them is meaningful, the variable is continuous. For example, two values for the time taken for a weal to subside can be 10 and 13 min. The mid-way value would be 11.5 min which makes sense. However, for a number of weals, suppose you have a pair of values – 5 and 8 – the midway value would be 6.5 weals, which does not make sense.
Under the umbrella of qualitative variables, you can have nominal/categorical variables and ordinal variables
Nominal/categorical variables are, as the name suggests, variables which can be slotted into different categories (e.g., gender or type of psoriasis).
Ordinal variables or ranked variables are similar to categorical, but can be put into an order (e.g., a scale for severity of itching).
Dependent and independent variables
In the context of an experimental study, the dependent variable (also called outcome variable) is directly linked to the primary outcome of the study. For example, in a clinical trial on psoriasis, the PASI (psoriasis area severity index) would possibly be one dependent variable. The independent variable (sometime also called explanatory variable) is something which is not affected by the experiment itself but which can be manipulated to affect the dependent variable. Other terms sometimes used synonymously include blocking variable, covariate, or predictor variable. Confounding variables are extra variables, which can have an effect on the experiment. They are linked with dependent and independent variables and can cause spurious association. For example, in a clinical trial for a topical treatment in psoriasis, the concomitant use of moisturizers might be a confounding variable. A control variable is a variable that must be kept constant during the course of an experiment.
Descriptive Statistics
Statistics can be broadly divided into descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.[ 3 , 4 ] Descriptive statistics give a summary about the sample being studied without drawing any inferences based on probability theory. Even if the primary aim of a study involves inferential statistics, descriptive statistics are still used to give a general summary. When we describe the population using tools such as frequency distribution tables, percentages, and other measures of central tendency like the mean, for example, we are talking about descriptive statistics. When we use a specific statistical test (e.g., Mann–Whitney U-test) to compare the mean scores and express it in terms of statistical significance, we are talking about inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics can help in summarizing data in the form of simple quantitative measures such as percentages or means or in the form of visual summaries such as histograms and box plots.
Descriptive statistics can be used to describe a single variable (univariate analysis) or more than one variable (bivariate/multivariate analysis). In the case of more than one variable, descriptive statistics can help summarize relationships between variables using tools such as scatter plots.
Descriptive statistics can be broadly put under two categories:
Sorting/grouping and illustration/visual displays
Summary statistics.
Sorting and grouping
Sorting and grouping is most commonly done using frequency distribution tables. For continuous variables, it is generally better to use groups in the frequency table. Ideally, group sizes should be equal (except in extreme ends where open groups are used; e.g., age “greater than” or “less than”).
Another form of presenting frequency distributions is the “stem and leaf” diagram, which is considered to be a more accurate form of description.
Suppose the weight in kilograms of a group of 10 patients is as follows:
56, 34, 48, 43, 87, 78, 54, 62, 61, 59
The “stem” records the value of the “ten's” place (or higher) and the “leaf” records the value in the “one's” place [ Table 1 ].
Stem and leaf plot
Illustration/visual display of data
The most common tools used for visual display include frequency diagrams, bar charts (for noncontinuous variables) and histograms (for continuous variables). Composite bar charts can be used to compare variables. For example, the frequency distribution in a sample population of males and females can be illustrated as given in Figure 1 .
Composite bar chart
A pie chart helps show how a total quantity is divided among its constituent variables. Scatter diagrams can be used to illustrate the relationship between two variables. For example, global scores given for improvement in a condition like acne by the patient and the doctor [ Figure 2 ].
Scatter diagram
Summary statistics
The main tools used for summary statistics are broadly grouped into measures of central tendency (such as mean, median, and mode) and measures of dispersion or variation (such as range, standard deviation, and variance).
Imagine that the data below represent the weights of a sample of 15 pediatric patients arranged in ascending order:
30, 35, 37, 38, 38, 38, 42, 42, 44, 46, 47, 48, 51, 53, 86
Just having the raw data does not mean much to us, so we try to express it in terms of some values, which give a summary of the data.
The mean is basically the sum of all the values divided by the total number. In this case, we get a value of 45.
The problem is that some extreme values (outliers), like “'86,” in this case can skew the value of the mean. In this case, we consider other values like the median, which is the point that divides the distribution into two equal halves. It is also referred to as the 50 th percentile (50% of the values are above it and 50% are below it). In our previous example, since we have already arranged the values in ascending order we find that the point which divides it into two equal halves is the 8 th value – 42. In case of a total number of values being even, we choose the two middle points and take an average to reach the median.
The mode is the most common data point. In our example, this would be 38. The mode as in our case may not necessarily be in the center of the distribution.
The median is the best measure of central tendency from among the mean, median, and mode. In a “symmetric” distribution, all three are the same, whereas in skewed data the median and mean are not the same; lie more toward the skew, with the mean lying further to the skew compared with the median. For example, in Figure 3 , a right skewed distribution is seen (direction of skew is based on the tail); data values' distribution is longer on the right-hand (positive) side than on the left-hand side. The mean is typically greater than the median in such cases.
Location of mode, median, and mean
Measures of dispersion
The range gives the spread between the lowest and highest values. In our previous example, this will be 86-30 = 56.
A more valuable measure is the interquartile range. A quartile is one of the values which break the distribution into four equal parts. The 25 th percentile is the data point which divides the group between the first one-fourth and the last three-fourth of the data. The first one-fourth will form the first quartile. The 75 th percentile is the data point which divides the distribution into a first three-fourth and last one-fourth (the last one-fourth being the fourth quartile). The range between the 25 th percentile and 75 th percentile is called the interquartile range.
Variance is also a measure of dispersion. The larger the variance, the further the individual units are from the mean. Let us consider the same example we used for calculating the mean. The mean was 45.
For the first value (30), the deviation from the mean will be 15; for the last value (86), the deviation will be 41. Similarly we can calculate the deviations for all values in a sample. Adding these deviations and averaging will give a clue to the total dispersion, but the problem is that since the deviations are a mix of negative and positive values, the final total becomes zero. To calculate the variance, this problem is overcome by adding squares of the deviations. So variance would be the sum of squares of the variation divided by the total number in the population (for a sample we use “n − 1”). To get a more realistic value of the average dispersion, we take the square root of the variance, which is called the “standard deviation.”
The box plot
The box plot is a composite representation that portrays the mean, median, range, and the outliers [ Figure 4 ].
The concept of skewness and kurtosis
Skewness is a measure of the symmetry of distribution. Basically if the distribution curve is symmetric, it looks the same on either side of the central point. When this is not the case, it is said to be skewed. Kurtosis is a representation of outliers. Distributions with high kurtosis tend to have “heavy tails” indicating a larger number of outliers, whereas distributions with low kurtosis have light tails, indicating lesser outliers. There are formulas to calculate both skewness and kurtosis [Figures 5 – 8 ].
Positive skew
High kurtosis (positive kurtosis – also called leptokurtic)
Negative skew
Low kurtosis (negative kurtosis – also called “Platykurtic”)
Sample Size
In an ideal study, we should be able to include all units of a particular population under study, something that is referred to as a census.[ 5 , 6 ] This would remove the chances of sampling error (difference between the outcome characteristics in a random sample when compared with the true population values – something that is virtually unavoidable when you take a random sample). However, it is obvious that this would not be feasible in most situations. Hence, we have to study a subset of the population to reach to our conclusions. This representative subset is a sample and we need to have sufficient numbers in this sample to make meaningful and accurate conclusions and reduce the effect of sampling error.
We also need to know that broadly sampling can be divided into two types – probability sampling and nonprobability sampling. Examples of probability sampling include methods such as simple random sampling (each member in a population has an equal chance of being selected), stratified random sampling (in nonhomogeneous populations, the population is divided into subgroups – followed be random sampling in each subgroup), systematic (sampling is based on a systematic technique – e.g., every third person is selected for a survey), and cluster sampling (similar to stratified sampling except that the clusters here are preexisting clusters unlike stratified sampling where the researcher decides on the stratification criteria), whereas nonprobability sampling, where every unit in the population does not have an equal chance of inclusion into the sample, includes methods such as convenience sampling (e.g., sample selected based on ease of access) and purposive sampling (where only people who meet specific criteria are included in the sample).
An accurate calculation of sample size is an essential aspect of good study design. It is important to calculate the sample size much in advance, rather than have to go for post hoc analysis. A sample size that is too less may make the study underpowered, whereas a sample size which is more than necessary might lead to a wastage of resources.
We will first go through the sample size calculation for a hypothesis-based design (like a randomized control trial).
The important factors to consider for sample size calculation include study design, type of statistical test, level of significance, power and effect size, variance (standard deviation for quantitative data), and expected proportions in the case of qualitative data. This is based on previous data, either based on previous studies or based on the clinicians' experience. In case the study is something being conducted for the first time, a pilot study might be conducted which helps generate these data for further studies based on a larger sample size). It is also important to know whether the data follow a normal distribution or not.
Two essential aspects we must understand are the concept of Type I and Type II errors. In a study that compares two groups, a null hypothesis assumes that there is no significant difference between the two groups, and any observed difference being due to sampling or experimental error. When we reject a null hypothesis, when it is true, we label it as a Type I error (also denoted as “alpha,” correlating with significance levels). In a Type II error (also denoted as “beta”), we fail to reject a null hypothesis, when the alternate hypothesis is actually true. Type II errors are usually expressed as “1- β,” correlating with the power of the test. While there are no absolute rules, the minimal levels accepted are 0.05 for α (corresponding to a significance level of 5%) and 0.20 for β (corresponding to a minimum recommended power of “1 − 0.20,” or 80%).
Effect size and minimal clinically relevant difference
For a clinical trial, the investigator will have to decide in advance what clinically detectable change is significant (for numerical data, this is could be the anticipated outcome means in the two groups, whereas for categorical data, it could correlate with the proportions of successful outcomes in two groups.). While we will not go into details of the formula for sample size calculation, some important points are as follows:
In the context where effect size is involved, the sample size is inversely proportional to the square of the effect size. What this means in effect is that reducing the effect size will lead to an increase in the required sample size.
Reducing the level of significance (alpha) or increasing power (1-β) will lead to an increase in the calculated sample size.
An increase in variance of the outcome leads to an increase in the calculated sample size.
A note is that for estimation type of studies/surveys, sample size calculation needs to consider some other factors too. This includes an idea about total population size (this generally does not make a major difference when population size is above 20,000, so in situations where population size is not known we can assume a population of 20,000 or more). The other factor is the “margin of error” – the amount of deviation which the investigators find acceptable in terms of percentages. Regarding confidence levels, ideally, a 95% confidence level is the minimum recommended for surveys too. Finally, we need an idea of the expected/crude prevalence – either based on previous studies or based on estimates.
Sample size calculation also needs to add corrections for patient drop-outs/lost-to-follow-up patients and missing records. An important point is that in some studies dealing with rare diseases, it may be difficult to achieve desired sample size. In these cases, the investigators might have to rework outcomes or maybe pool data from multiple centers. Although post hoc power can be analyzed, a better approach suggested is to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the outcome and interpret the study results based on this.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest.
There are no conflicts of interest.
- 1. Seltman HJ, editor. Experimental Design and Analysis. 1st ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2012. Variable classification; pp. 9–18. [ Google Scholar ]
- 2. Hoeks S, Kardys I, Lenzen M, van Domburg R, Boersma E. Tools and techniques – Statistics: Descriptive statistics. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:1001–3. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I8A167. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- 3. Seltman HJ, editor. Experimental Design and Analysis. 1st ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2012. Review of probability; pp. 19–60. [ Google Scholar ]
- 4. Nick TG. Descriptive statistics. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;404:33–52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_3. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- 5. Endacott R, Botti M. Clinical research 3: Sample selection. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007;15:234–8. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.12.006. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- 6. Hazra A, Gogtay N. Biostatistics series module 5: Determining sample size. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61:496–504. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.173988. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- View on publisher site
- PDF (702.9 KB)
- Collections
Similar articles
Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.
- Download .nbib .nbib
- Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Add to Collections
- Descriptive Research Designs: Types, Examples & Methods
One of the components of research is getting enough information about the research problem—the what, how, when and where answers, which is why descriptive research is an important type of research. It is very useful when conducting research whose aim is to identify characteristics, frequencies, trends, correlations, and categories.
This research method takes a problem with little to no relevant information and gives it a befitting description using qualitative and quantitative research method s. Descriptive research aims to accurately describe a research problem.
In the subsequent sections, we will be explaining what descriptive research means, its types, examples, and data collection methods.
What is Descriptive Research?
Descriptive research is a type of research that describes a population, situation, or phenomenon that is being studied. It focuses on answering the how, what, when, and where questions If a research problem, rather than the why.
This is mainly because it is important to have a proper understanding of what a research problem is about before investigating why it exists in the first place.
For example, an investor considering an investment in the ever-changing Amsterdam housing market needs to understand what the current state of the market is, how it changes (increasing or decreasing), and when it changes (time of the year) before asking for the why. This is where descriptive research comes in.
What Are The Types of Descriptive Research?
Descriptive research is classified into different types according to the kind of approach that is used in conducting descriptive research. The different types of descriptive research are highlighted below:
- Descriptive-survey
Descriptive survey research uses surveys to gather data about varying subjects. This data aims to know the extent to which different conditions can be obtained among these subjects.
For example, a researcher wants to determine the qualification of employed professionals in Maryland. He uses a survey as his research instrument , and each item on the survey related to qualifications is subjected to a Yes/No answer.
This way, the researcher can describe the qualifications possessed by the employed demographics of this community.
- Descriptive-normative survey
This is an extension of the descriptive survey, with the addition being the normative element. In the descriptive-normative survey, the results of the study should be compared with the norm.
For example, an organization that wishes to test the skills of its employees by a team may have them take a skills test. The skills tests are the evaluation tool in this case, and the result of this test is compared with the norm of each role.
If the score of the team is one standard deviation above the mean, it is very satisfactory, if within the mean, satisfactory, and one standard deviation below the mean is unsatisfactory.
- Descriptive-status
This is a quantitative description technique that seeks to answer questions about real-life situations. For example, a researcher researching the income of the employees in a company, and the relationship with their performance.
A survey will be carried out to gather enough data about the income of the employees, then their performance will be evaluated and compared to their income. This will help determine whether a higher income means better performance and low income means lower performance or vice versa.
- Descriptive-analysis
The descriptive-analysis method of research describes a subject by further analyzing it, which in this case involves dividing it into 2 parts. For example, the HR personnel of a company that wishes to analyze the job role of each employee of the company may divide the employees into the people that work at the Headquarters in the US and those that work from Oslo, Norway office.
A questionnaire is devised to analyze the job role of employees with similar salaries and who work in similar positions.
- Descriptive classification
This method is employed in biological sciences for the classification of plants and animals. A researcher who wishes to classify the sea animals into different species will collect samples from various search stations, then classify them accordingly.
- Descriptive-comparative
In descriptive-comparative research, the researcher considers 2 variables that are not manipulated, and establish a formal procedure to conclude that one is better than the other. For example, an examination body wants to determine the better method of conducting tests between paper-based and computer-based tests.
A random sample of potential participants of the test may be asked to use the 2 different methods, and factors like failure rates, time factors, and others will be evaluated to arrive at the best method.
- Correlative Survey
Correlative surveys are used to determine whether the relationship between 2 variables is positive, negative, or neutral. That is, if 2 variables say X and Y are directly proportional, inversely proportional or are not related to each other.
Examples of Descriptive Research
There are different examples of descriptive research, that may be highlighted from its types, uses, and applications. However, we will be restricting ourselves to only 3 distinct examples in this article.
- Comparing Student Performance:
An academic institution may wish 2 compare the performance of its junior high school students in English language and Mathematics. This may be used to classify students based on 2 major groups, with one group going ahead to study while courses, while the other study courses in the Arts & Humanities field.
Students who are more proficient in mathematics will be encouraged to go into STEM and vice versa. Institutions may also use this data to identify students’ weak points and work on ways to assist them.
- Scientific Classification
During the major scientific classification of plants, animals, and periodic table elements, the characteristics and components of each subject are evaluated and used to determine how they are classified.
For example, living things may be classified into kingdom Plantae or kingdom animal is depending on their nature. Further classification may group animals into mammals, pieces, vertebrae, invertebrae, etc.
All these classifications are made a result of descriptive research which describes what they are.
- Human Behavior
When studying human behaviour based on a factor or event, the researcher observes the characteristics, behaviour, and reaction, then use it to conclude. A company willing to sell to its target market needs to first study the behaviour of the market.
This may be done by observing how its target reacts to a competitor’s product, then use it to determine their behaviour.
What are the Characteristics of Descriptive Research?
The characteristics of descriptive research can be highlighted from its definition, applications, data collection methods, and examples. Some characteristics of descriptive research are:
- Quantitativeness
Descriptive research uses a quantitative research method by collecting quantifiable information to be used for statistical analysis of the population sample. This is very common when dealing with research in the physical sciences.
- Qualitativeness
It can also be carried out using the qualitative research method, to properly describe the research problem. This is because descriptive research is more explanatory than exploratory or experimental.
- Uncontrolled variables
In descriptive research, researchers cannot control the variables like they do in experimental research.
- The basis for further research
The results of descriptive research can be further analyzed and used in other research methods. It can also inform the next line of research, including the research method that should be used.
This is because it provides basic information about the research problem, which may give birth to other questions like why a particular thing is the way it is.
Why Use Descriptive Research Design?
Descriptive research can be used to investigate the background of a research problem and get the required information needed to carry out further research. It is used in multiple ways by different organizations, and especially when getting the required information about their target audience.
- Define subject characteristics :
It is used to determine the characteristics of the subjects, including their traits, behaviour, opinion, etc. This information may be gathered with the use of surveys, which are shared with the respondents who in this case, are the research subjects.
For example, a survey evaluating the number of hours millennials in a community spends on the internet weekly, will help a service provider make informed business decisions regarding the market potential of the community.
- Measure Data Trends
It helps to measure the changes in data over some time through statistical methods. Consider the case of individuals who want to invest in stock markets, so they evaluate the changes in prices of the available stocks to make a decision investment decision.
Brokerage companies are however the ones who carry out the descriptive research process, while individuals can view the data trends and make decisions.
Descriptive research is also used to compare how different demographics respond to certain variables. For example, an organization may study how people with different income levels react to the launch of a new Apple phone.
This kind of research may take a survey that will help determine which group of individuals are purchasing the new Apple phone. Do the low-income earners also purchase the phone, or only the high-income earners do?
Further research using another technique will explain why low-income earners are purchasing the phone even though they can barely afford it. This will help inform strategies that will lure other low-income earners and increase company sales.
- Validate existing conditions
When you are not sure about the validity of an existing condition, you can use descriptive research to ascertain the underlying patterns of the research object. This is because descriptive research methods make an in-depth analysis of each variable before making conclusions.
- Conducted Overtime
Descriptive research is conducted over some time to ascertain the changes observed at each point in time. The higher the number of times it is conducted, the more authentic the conclusion will be.
What are the Disadvantages of Descriptive Research?
- Response and Non-response Bias
Respondents may either decide not to respond to questions or give incorrect responses if they feel the questions are too confidential. When researchers use observational methods, respondents may also decide to behave in a particular manner because they feel they are being watched.
- The researcher may decide to influence the result of the research due to personal opinion or bias towards a particular subject. For example, a stockbroker who also has a business of his own may try to lure investors into investing in his own company by manipulating results.
- A case-study or sample taken from a large population is not representative of the whole population.
- Limited scope:The scope of descriptive research is limited to the what of research, with no information on why thereby limiting the scope of the research.
What are the Data Collection Methods in Descriptive Research?
There are 3 main data collection methods in descriptive research, namely; observational method, case study method, and survey research.
1. Observational Method
The observational method allows researchers to collect data based on their view of the behaviour and characteristics of the respondent, with the respondents themselves not directly having an input. It is often used in market research, psychology, and some other social science research to understand human behaviour.
It is also an important aspect of physical scientific research, with it being one of the most effective methods of conducting descriptive research . This process can be said to be either quantitative or qualitative.
Quantitative observation involved the objective collection of numerical data , whose results can be analyzed using numerical and statistical methods.
Qualitative observation, on the other hand, involves the monitoring of characteristics and not the measurement of numbers. The researcher makes his observation from a distance, records it, and is used to inform conclusions.
2. Case Study Method
A case study is a sample group (an individual, a group of people, organizations, events, etc.) whose characteristics are used to describe the characteristics of a larger group in which the case study is a subgroup. The information gathered from investigating a case study may be generalized to serve the larger group.
This generalization, may, however, be risky because case studies are not sufficient to make accurate predictions about larger groups. Case studies are a poor case of generalization.
3. Survey Research
This is a very popular data collection method in research designs. In survey research, researchers create a survey or questionnaire and distribute it to respondents who give answers.
Generally, it is used to obtain quick information directly from the primary source and also conducting rigorous quantitative and qualitative research. In some cases, survey research uses a blend of both qualitative and quantitative strategies.
Survey research can be carried out both online and offline using the following methods
- Online Surveys: This is a cheap method of carrying out surveys and getting enough responses. It can be carried out using Formplus, an online survey builder. Formplus has amazing tools and features that will help increase response rates.
- Offline Surveys: This includes paper forms, mobile offline forms , and SMS-based forms.
What Are The Differences Between Descriptive and Correlational Research?
Before going into the differences between descriptive and correlation research, we need to have a proper understanding of what correlation research is about. Therefore, we will be giving a summary of the correlation research below.
Correlational research is a type of descriptive research, which is used to measure the relationship between 2 variables, with the researcher having no control over them. It aims to find whether there is; positive correlation (both variables change in the same direction), negative correlation (the variables change in the opposite direction), or zero correlation (there is no relationship between the variables).
Correlational research may be used in 2 situations;
(i) when trying to find out if there is a relationship between two variables, and
(ii) when a causal relationship is suspected between two variables, but it is impractical or unethical to conduct experimental research that manipulates one of the variables.
Below are some of the differences between correlational and descriptive research:
- Definitions :
Descriptive research aims is a type of research that provides an in-depth understanding of the study population, while correlational research is the type of research that measures the relationship between 2 variables.
- Characteristics :
Descriptive research provides descriptive data explaining what the research subject is about, while correlation research explores the relationship between data and not their description.
- Predictions :
Predictions cannot be made in descriptive research while correlation research accommodates the possibility of making predictions.
Descriptive Research vs. Causal Research
Descriptive research and causal research are both research methodologies, however, one focuses on a subject’s behaviors while the latter focuses on a relationship’s cause-and-effect. To buttress the above point, descriptive research aims to describe and document the characteristics, behaviors, or phenomena of a particular or specific population or situation.
It focuses on providing an accurate and detailed account of an already existing state of affairs between variables. Descriptive research answers the questions of “what,” “where,” “when,” and “how” without attempting to establish any causal relationships or explain any underlying factors that might have caused the behavior.
Causal research, on the other hand, seeks to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables. It aims to point out the factors that influence or cause a particular result or behavior. Causal research involves manipulating variables, controlling conditions or a subgroup, and observing the resulting effects. The primary objective of causal research is to establish a cause-effect relationship and provide insights into why certain phenomena happen the way they do.
Descriptive Research vs. Analytical Research
Descriptive research provides a detailed and comprehensive account of a specific situation or phenomenon. It focuses on describing and summarizing data without making inferences or attempting to explain underlying factors or the cause of the factor.
It is primarily concerned with providing an accurate and objective representation of the subject of research. While analytical research goes beyond the description of the phenomena and seeks to analyze and interpret data to discover if there are patterns, relationships, or any underlying factors.
It examines the data critically, applies statistical techniques or other analytical methods, and draws conclusions based on the discovery. Analytical research also aims to explore the relationships between variables and understand the underlying mechanisms or processes involved.
Descriptive Research vs. Exploratory Research
Descriptive research is a research method that focuses on providing a detailed and accurate account of a specific situation, group, or phenomenon. This type of research describes the characteristics, behaviors, or relationships within the given context without looking for an underlying cause.
Descriptive research typically involves collecting and analyzing quantitative or qualitative data to generate descriptive statistics or narratives. Exploratory research differs from descriptive research because it aims to explore and gain firsthand insights or knowledge into a relatively unexplored or poorly understood topic.
It focuses on generating ideas, hypotheses, or theories rather than providing definitive answers. Exploratory research is often conducted at the early stages of a research project to gather preliminary information and identify key variables or factors for further investigation. It involves open-ended interviews, observations, or small-scale surveys to gather qualitative data.
Read More – Exploratory Research: What are its Method & Examples?
Descriptive Research vs. Experimental Research
Descriptive research aims to describe and document the characteristics, behaviors, or phenomena of a particular population or situation. It focuses on providing an accurate and detailed account of the existing state of affairs.
Descriptive research typically involves collecting data through surveys, observations, or existing records and analyzing the data to generate descriptive statistics or narratives. It does not involve manipulating variables or establishing cause-and-effect relationships.
Experimental research, on the other hand, involves manipulating variables and controlling conditions to investigate cause-and-effect relationships. It aims to establish causal relationships by introducing an intervention or treatment and observing the resulting effects.
Experimental research typically involves randomly assigning participants to different groups, such as control and experimental groups, and measuring the outcomes. It allows researchers to control for confounding variables and draw causal conclusions.
Related – Experimental vs Non-Experimental Research: 15 Key Differences
Descriptive Research vs. Explanatory Research
Descriptive research focuses on providing a detailed and accurate account of a specific situation, group, or phenomenon. It aims to describe the characteristics, behaviors, or relationships within the given context.
Descriptive research is primarily concerned with providing an objective representation of the subject of study without explaining underlying causes or mechanisms. Explanatory research seeks to explain the relationships between variables and uncover the underlying causes or mechanisms.
It goes beyond description and aims to understand the reasons or factors that influence a particular outcome or behavior. Explanatory research involves analyzing data, conducting statistical analyses, and developing theories or models to explain the observed relationships.
Descriptive Research vs. Inferential Research
Descriptive research focuses on describing and summarizing data without making inferences or generalizations beyond the specific sample or population being studied. It aims to provide an accurate and objective representation of the subject of study.
Descriptive research typically involves analyzing data to generate descriptive statistics, such as means, frequencies, or percentages, to describe the characteristics or behaviors observed.
Inferential research, however, involves making inferences or generalizations about a larger population based on a smaller sample.
It aims to draw conclusions about the population characteristics or relationships by analyzing the sample data. Inferential research uses statistical techniques to estimate population parameters, test hypotheses, and determine the level of confidence or significance in the findings.
Related – Inferential Statistics: Definition, Types + Examples
Conclusion
The uniqueness of descriptive research partly lies in its ability to explore both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Therefore, when conducting descriptive research, researchers have the opportunity to use a wide variety of techniques that aids the research process.
Descriptive research explores research problems in-depth, beyond the surface level thereby giving a detailed description of the research subject. That way, it can aid further research in the field, including other research methods .
It is also very useful in solving real-life problems in various fields of social science, physical science, and education.
Connect to Formplus, Get Started Now - It's Free!
- descriptive research
- descriptive research method
- example of descriptive research
- types of descriptive research
- busayo.longe
You may also like:
Acceptance Sampling: Meaning, Examples, When to Use
In this post, we will discuss extensively what acceptance sampling is and when it is applied.
Cross-Sectional Studies: Types, Pros, Cons & Uses
In this article, we’ll look at what cross-sectional studies are, how it applies to your research and how to use Formplus to collect...
Type I vs Type II Errors: Causes, Examples & Prevention
This article will discuss the two different types of errors in hypothesis testing and how you can prevent them from occurring in your research
Extrapolation in Statistical Research: Definition, Examples, Types, Applications
In this article we’ll look at the different types and characteristics of extrapolation, plus how it contrasts to interpolation.
Formplus - For Seamless Data Collection
Collect data the right way with a versatile data collection tool. try formplus and transform your work productivity today..
What is Descriptive Research and How is it Used?
Introduction
What does descriptive research mean, why would you use a descriptive research design, what are the characteristics of descriptive research, examples of descriptive research, what are the data collection methods in descriptive research, how do you analyze descriptive research data, ensuring validity and reliability in the findings.
Conducting descriptive research offers researchers a way to present phenomena as they naturally occur. Rooted in an open-ended and non-experimental nature, this type of research focuses on portraying the details of specific phenomena or contexts, helping readers gain a clearer understanding of topics of interest.
From businesses gauging customer satisfaction to educators assessing classroom dynamics, the data collected from descriptive research provides invaluable insights across various fields.
This article aims to illuminate the essence, utility, characteristics, and methods associated with descriptive research, guiding those who wish to harness its potential in their respective domains.
At its core, descriptive research refers to a systematic approach used by researchers to collect, analyze, and present data about real-life phenomena to describe it in its natural context. It primarily aims to describe what exists, based on empirical observations .
Unlike experimental research, where variables are manipulated to observe outcomes, descriptive research deals with the "as-is" scenario to facilitate further research by providing a framework or new insights on which continuing studies can build.
Definition of descriptive research
Descriptive research is defined as a research method that observes and describes the characteristics of a particular group, situation, or phenomenon.
The goal is not to establish cause and effect relationships but rather to provide a detailed account of the situation.
The difference between descriptive and exploratory research
While both descriptive and exploratory research seek to provide insights into a topic or phenomenon, they differ in their focus. Exploratory research is more about investigating a topic to develop preliminary insights or to identify potential areas of interest.
In contrast, descriptive research offers detailed accounts and descriptions of the observed phenomenon, seeking to paint a full picture of what's happening.
The evolution of descriptive research in academia
Historically, descriptive research has played a foundational role in numerous academic disciplines. Anthropologists, for instance, used this approach to document cultures and societies. Psychologists have employed it to capture behaviors, emotions, and reactions.
Over time, the method has evolved, incorporating technological advancements and adapting to contemporary needs, yet its essence remains rooted in describing a phenomenon or setting as it is.
Descriptive research serves as a fundamental part of research given its ability to provide a detailed snapshot of life. Its unique qualities and methods make it an invaluable method for various research purposes. Here's why:
Benefits of obtaining a clear picture
Descriptive research captures the present state of phenomena, offering researchers a detailed reflection of situations. This unaltered representation is important for research fields like marketing, where understanding current consumer behavior can shape future strategies.
Facilitating data interpretation
Given its straightforward nature, descriptive research can provide data that's easier to interpret, both for researchers and their audiences. Rather than analyzing complex statistical relationships among variables, researchers present detailed descriptions of their qualitative observations . Researchers can engage in in-depth analysis relating to their research question , but audiences can also draw insights from their own interpretations or reflections on potential underlying patterns.
Enhancing the clarity of the research problem
By presenting things as they are, descriptive research can help elucidate ambiguous research questions. A well-executed descriptive study can shine light on overlooked aspects of a problem, paving the way for further investigative research.
Addressing practical problems
In real-world scenarios, it's not always feasible to manipulate variables or set up controlled experiments. For instance, in social sciences, understanding cultural norms as they happen is an important principle in data collection and analysis. Descriptive research allows for the capturing of such developments in their natural context, ensuring genuine understanding.
Building a foundation for future research
Often, descriptive studies act as stepping stones for more complex research endeavors. By establishing baseline data and highlighting patterns, they create a platform upon which more intricate hypotheses can be built and tested in subsequent studies.
Descriptive research is distinguished by a set of fundamental characteristics that set it apart from other research methodologies . Recognizing these features can help researchers effectively design, implement , and interpret descriptive studies.
Specificity in the research question
As with all research, descriptive research starts with a well-defined research question aiming to detail a particular phenomenon. The specificity ensures that the study remains focused on gathering relevant data without unnecessary deviations.
Focus on the present situation
While some research methods aim to predict future trends or uncover historical truths, descriptive research is predominantly concerned with the present. It seeks to capture the current state of affairs, such as understanding today's consumer habits or documenting a newly observed phenomenon.
Standardized and structured methodology
To ensure credibility and consistency in results, descriptive research often employs standardized methods. Whether it's using a fixed set of survey questions or adhering to specific observation protocols, this structured approach ensures that data is collected uniformly, making it easier to compare and analyze.
Replicability and consistency in results
Due to its structured methodology, findings from descriptive research can often be replicated in different settings or with different samples. This consistency adds to the credibility of the results, reinforcing the validity of the insights drawn from the study.
Analyze data quickly and efficiently with ATLAS.ti
Download a free trial to see how you can make sense of complex qualitative data.
Numerous fields and sectors conduct descriptive research for its versatile and detailed nature. Through its focus on presenting things as they naturally occur, it provides insights into a myriad of scenarios. Here are some tangible examples from diverse domains:
Conducting market research
Businesses often turn to data analysis through descriptive research to understand the demographics of their target market. For instance, a company launching a new product might survey potential customers to understand their age, gender, income level, and purchasing habits, offering valuable data for targeted marketing strategies.
Evaluating employee behaviors
Organizations rely on descriptive research designs to assess the behavior and attitudes of their employees. By conducting observations or surveys , companies can gather data on workplace satisfaction, collaboration patterns, or the impact of a new office layout on productivity.
Understanding consumer preferences
Brands aiming to understand their consumers' likes and dislikes often use descriptive research. By observing shopping behaviors or conducting product feedback surveys , they can gauge preferences and adjust their offerings accordingly.
Documenting historical patterns
Historians and anthropologists employ descriptive research to identify patterns through analysis of events or cultural practices. For instance, a historian might detail the daily life in a particular era, while an anthropologist might document rituals and ceremonies of a specific tribe.
Assessing student performance
Educational researchers can utilize descriptive studies to understand the effectiveness of teaching methodologies. By observing classrooms or surveying students, they can measure data trends and gauge the impact of a new teaching technique or curriculum on student engagement and performance.
Descriptive research methods aim to authentically represent situations and phenomena. These techniques ensure the collection of abundant and reliable data about the subject of interest.
The most appropriate descriptive research method depends on the research question and resources available for your research study.
Surveys and questionnaires
One of the most familiar tools in the researcher's arsenal, surveys and questionnaires offer a structured means of collecting data from a vast audience. Through carefully designed questions, researchers can obtain standardized responses that lend themselves to straightforward comparison and analysis in quantitative and qualitative research .
Survey research can manifest in various formats, from face-to-face interactions and telephone conversations to digital platforms. While surveys can reach a broad audience and generate quantitative data ripe for statistical analysis, they also come with the challenge of potential biases in design and rely heavily on respondent honesty.
Observations and case studies
Direct or participant observation is a method wherein researchers actively watch and document behaviors or events. A researcher might, for instance, observe the dynamics within a classroom or the behaviors of shoppers in a market setting.
Case studies provide an even deeper dive, focusing on a thorough analysis of a specific individual, group, or event. These methods present the advantage of capturing real-time, detailed data, but they might also be time-intensive and can sometimes introduce observer bias .
Interviews and focus groups
Interviews , whether they follow a structured script or flow more organically, are a powerful means to extract detailed insights directly from participants. On the other hand, focus groups gather multiple participants for discussions, aiming to gather diverse and collective opinions on a particular topic or product.
These methods offer the benefit of deep insights and adaptability in data collection . However, they necessitate skilled interviewers, and focus group settings might see individual opinions being influenced by group dynamics.
Document and content analysis
Here, instead of generating new data, researchers examine existing documents or content . This can range from studying historical records and newspapers to analyzing media content or literature.
Analyzing existing content offers the advantage of accessibility and can provide insights over longer time frames. However, the reliability and relevance of the content are necessary qualities in descriptive research, and researchers must approach this method with a discerning eye.
Descriptive research data, rich in details and insights, necessitates meticulous analysis to derive meaningful conclusions. The analysis process transforms raw data into structured findings that can be communicated and acted upon.
Qualitative content analysis
For data collected through interviews , focus groups , observations , or open-ended survey questions , qualitative content analysis is a popular choice. This involves examining non-numerical data to identify patterns, themes, or categories.
By coding responses or observations , researchers can identify recurring elements, making it easier to comprehend larger data sets and draw insights.
Using descriptive statistics
When dealing with quantitative data from surveys or experiments, descriptive statistics are invaluable. Measures such as mean, median, mode, standard deviation, and frequency distributions help summarize data sets, providing a snapshot of the overall patterns.
Graphical representations like histograms, pie charts, or bar graphs can further help in visualizing these statistics.
Coding and categorizing the data
Both qualitative and quantitative data often require coding. Coding involves assigning labels to specific responses or behaviors to group similar segments of data. This categorization aids in identifying patterns, especially in vast data sets.
For instance, responses to open-ended questions in a survey can be coded based on keywords or sentiments, allowing for a more structured analysis.
Visual representation through graphs and charts
Visual aids like graphs, charts, and plots can simplify complex data, making it more accessible and understandable. Whether it's showcasing frequency distributions through histograms or mapping out relationships with networks, visual representations can help researchers effectively identify trends and patterns in their data.
The credibility of findings is paramount in any qualitative research . Without trustworthiness in the results, even the most meticulously gathered data can lose its value. Two qualities that bolster the credibility of research outcomes are validity and reliability .
Validity: Measuring the right thing
Validity addresses the accuracy of the research. It seeks to answer the question: Is the research genuinely measuring what it aims to measure? In descriptive research, where the objective is to paint an authentic picture of the current state of affairs, researchers are responsible for establishing the necessary validity in their research design.
For instance, if a study aims to understand consumer preferences for a product category, the questions posed should genuinely reflect those preferences and not veer into unrelated territories. Multiple forms of validity, including content, criterion, and construct validity, can be examined to ensure that the research instruments and processes are aligned with the research goals.
Reliability: Consistency in findings
Reliability, on the other hand, refers to the consistency of the research findings. When a study demonstrates reliability, this suggests that others could repeat the study and the outcomes would remain consistent across repetitions.
In descriptive research, factors like the clarity of survey questions , the training of observers , and the standardization of interview protocols play a role in enhancing reliability. Techniques such as test-retest and internal consistency measurements can be employed to assess and improve reliability.
Make your research happen with ATLAS.ti
Analyze descriptive research with our powerful data analysis interface. Download a free trial of ATLAS.ti.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- Browse Titles
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.
StatPearls [Internet].
Types of variables and commonly used statistical designs.
Jacob Shreffler ; Martin R. Huecker .
Affiliations
Last Update: March 6, 2023 .
- Definition/Introduction
Suitable statistical design represents a critical factor in permitting inferences from any research or scientific study. [1] Numerous statistical designs are implementable due to the advancement of software available for extensive data analysis. [1] Healthcare providers must possess some statistical knowledge to interpret new studies and provide up-to-date patient care. We present an overview of the types of variables and commonly used designs to facilitate this understanding. [2]
- Issues of Concern
Individuals who attempt to conduct research and choose an inappropriate design could select a faulty test and make flawed conclusions. This decision could lead to work being rejected for publication or (worse) lead to erroneous clinical decision-making, resulting in unsafe practice. [1] By understanding the types of variables and choosing tests that are appropriate to the data, individuals can draw appropriate conclusions and promote their work for an application. [3]
To determine which statistical design is appropriate for the data and research plan, one must first examine the scales of each measurement. [4] Multiple types of variables determine the appropriate design.
Ordinal data (also sometimes referred to as discrete) provide ranks and thus levels of degree between the measurement. [5] Likert items can serve as ordinal variables, but the Likert scale, the result of adding all the times, can be treated as a continuous variable. [6] For example, on a 20-item scale with each item ranging from 1 to 5, the item itself can be an ordinal variable, whereas if you add up all items, it could result in a range from 20 to 100. A general guideline for determining if a variable is ordinal vs. continuous: if the variable has more than ten options, it can be treated as a continuous variable. [7] The following examples are ordinal variables:
- Likert items
- Cancer stages
- Residency Year
Nominal, Categorical, Dichotomous, Binary
Other types of variables have interchangeable terms. Nominal and categorical variables describe samples in groups based on counts that fall within each category, have no quantitative relationships, and cannot be ranked. [8] Examples of these variables include:
- Service (i.e., emergency, internal medicine, psychiatry, etc.)
- Mode of Arrival (ambulance, helicopter, car)
A dichotomous or a binary variable is in the same family as nominal/categorical, but this type has only two options. Binary logistic regression, which will be discussed below, has two options for the outcome of interest/analysis. Often used as (yes/no), examples of dichotomous or binary variables would be:
- Alive (yes vs. no)
- Insurance (yes vs. no)
- Readmitted (yes vs. no)
With this overview of the types of variables provided, we will present commonly used statistical designs for different scales of measurement. Importantly, before deciding on a statistical test, individuals should perform exploratory data analysis to ensure there are no issues with the data and consider type I, type II errors, and power analysis. Furthermore, investigators should ensure appropriate statistical assumptions. [9] [10] For example, parametric tests, including some discussed below (t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlation, and regression), require the data to have a normal distribution and that the variances within each group are similar. [6] [11] After eliminating any issues based on exploratory data analysis and reducing the likelihood of committing type I and type II errors, a statistical test can be chosen. Below is a brief introduction to each of the commonly used statistical designs with examples of each type. An example of one research focus, with each type of statistical design discussed, can be found in Table 1 to provide more examples of commonly used statistical designs.
Commonly Used Statistical Designs
Independent Samples T-test
An independent samples t-test allows a comparison of two groups of subjects on one (continuous) variable. Examples in biomedical research include comparing results of treatment vs. control group and comparing differences based on gender (male vs. female).
Example: Does adherence to the ketogenic diet (yes/no; two groups) have a differential effect on total sleep time (minutes; continuous)?
Paired T-test
A paired t-test analyzes one sample population, measuring the same variable on two different occasions; this is often useful for intervention and educational research.
Example : Does participating in a research curriculum (one group with intervention) improve resident performance on a test to measure research competence (continuous)?
One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA), as an extension of the t-test, determines differences amongst more than two groups, or independent variables based on a dependent variable. [11] ANOVA is preferable to conducting multiple t-tests as it reduces the likelihood of committing a type I error.
Example: Are there differences in length of stay in the hospital (continuous) based on the mode of arrival (car, ambulance, helicopter, three groups)?
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Another procedure commonly used if the data for individuals are recurrent (repeatedly measured) is a repeated-measures ANOVA. [1] In these studies, multiple measurements of the dependent variable are collected from the study participants. [11] A within-subjects repeated measures ANOVA determines effects based on the treatment variable alone, whereas mixed ANOVAs allow both between-group effects and within-subjects to be considered.
Within-Subjects Example: How does ketamine effect mean arterial pressure (continuous variable) over time (repeated measurement)?
Mixed Example: Does mean arterial pressure (continuous) differ between males and females (two groups; mixed) on ketamine throughout a surgical procedure (over time; repeated measurement)?
Nonparametric Tests
Nonparametric tests, such as the Mann-Whitney U test (two groups; nonparametric t-test), Kruskal Wallis test (multiple groups; nonparametric ANOVA), Spearman’s rho (nonparametric correlation coefficient) can be used when data are ordinal or lack normality. [3] [5] Not requiring normality means that these tests allow skewed data to be analyzed; they require the meeting of fewer assumptions. [11]
Example: Is there a relationship between insurance status (two groups) and cancer stage (ordinal)?
A Chi-square test determines the effect of relationships between categorical variables, which determines frequencies and proportions into which these variables fall. [11] Similar to other tests discussed, variants and extensions of the chi-square test (e.g., Fisher’s exact test, McNemar’s test) may be suitable depending on the variables. [8]
Example: Is there a relationship between individuals with methamphetamine in their system (yes vs. no; dichotomous) and gender (male or female; dichotomous)?
Correlation
Correlations (used interchangeably with ‘associations’) signal patterns in data between variables. [1] A positive association occurs if values in one variable increase as values in another also increase. A negative association occurs if variables in one decrease while others increase. A correlation coefficient, expressed as r, describes the strength of the relationship: a value of 0 means no relationship, and the relationship strengthens as r approaches 1 (positive relationship) or -1 (negative association). [5]
Example: Is there a relationship between age (continuous) and satisfaction with life survey scores (continuous)?
Linear Regression
Regression allows researchers to determine the degrees of relationships between a dependent variable and independent variables and results in an equation for prediction. [11] A large number of variables are usable in regression methods.
Example: Which admission to the hospital metrics (multiple continuous) best predict the total length of stay (minutes; continuous)?
Binary Logistic Regression
This type of regression, which aims to predict an outcome, is appropriate when the dependent variable or outcome of interest is binary or dichotomous (yes/no; cured/not cured). [12]
Example: Which panel results (multiple of continuous, ordinal, categorical, dichotomous) best predict whether or not an individual will have a positive blood culture (dichotomous/binary)?
The table provides more examples of commonly used statistical designs by providing an example of one research focus and discussing each type of statistical design (see Table. Types of Variables and Statistical Designs).
- Clinical Significance
Though numerous other statistical designs and extensions of methods covered in this article exist, the above information provides a starting point for healthcare providers to become acquainted with variables and commonly used designs. Researchers should study types of variables before determining statistical tests to obtain relevant measures and valid study results. [6] There is a recommendation to consult a statistician to ensure appropriate usage of the statistical design based on the variables and that the assumptions are upheld. [1] With the variety of statistical software available, investigators must a priori understand the type of statistical tests when designing a study. [13] All providers must interpret and scrutinize journal publications to make evidence-based clinical decisions, and this becomes enhanced by a limited but sound understanding of variables and commonly used study designs. [14]
- Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
All interprofessional healthcare team members need to be familiar with study design and the variables used in studies to accurately evaluate new data and studies as they are published and apply the latest data to patient care and drive optimal outcomes.
- Review Questions
- Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
- Comment on this article.
Types of Variables and Statistical Designs. Contributed by M Huecker, MD, and J Shreffler, PhD
Disclosure: Jacob Shreffler declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Martin Huecker declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.
- Cite this Page Shreffler J, Huecker MR. Types of Variables and Commonly Used Statistical Designs. [Updated 2023 Mar 6]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.
In this Page
Bulk download.
- Bulk download StatPearls data from FTP
Related information
- PMC PubMed Central citations
- PubMed Links to PubMed
Similar articles in PubMed
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal. [Early Hum Dev. 2020] The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov; 150:105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
- Review How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. [BMJ Qual Saf. 2015] Review How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, Carter P, Dixon-Woods M. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May; 24(5):325-36. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
- Review How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. [Postgrad Med J. 2015] Review How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, Carter P, Dixon-Woods M. Postgrad Med J. 2015 Jun; 91(1076):343-54.
- Trends in the Usage of Statistical Software and Their Associated Study Designs in Health Sciences Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. [Cureus. 2021] Trends in the Usage of Statistical Software and Their Associated Study Designs in Health Sciences Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Masuadi E, Mohamud M, Almutairi M, Alsunaidi A, Alswayed AK, Aldhafeeri OF. Cureus. 2021 Jan 11; 13(1):e12639. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
- Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study. [Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024] Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study. Toews I, Anglemyer A, Nyirenda JL, Alsaid D, Balduzzi S, Grummich K, Schwingshackl L, Bero L. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4; 1(1):MR000034. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
Recent Activity
- Types of Variables and Commonly Used Statistical Designs - StatPearls Types of Variables and Commonly Used Statistical Designs - StatPearls
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on
Connect with NLM
National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894
Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
Help Accessibility Careers
Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey
What is Descriptive Research? Definition, Methods, Types and Examples
Descriptive research is a methodological approach that seeks to depict the characteristics of a phenomenon or subject under investigation. In scientific inquiry, it serves as a foundational tool for researchers aiming to observe, record, and analyze the intricate details of a particular topic. This method provides a rich and detailed account that aids in understanding, categorizing, and interpreting the subject matter.
Descriptive research design is widely employed across diverse fields, and its primary objective is to systematically observe and document all variables and conditions influencing the phenomenon.
After this descriptive research definition, let’s look at this example. Consider a researcher working on climate change adaptation, who wants to understand water management trends in an arid village in a specific study area. She must conduct a demographic survey of the region, gather population data, and then conduct descriptive research on this demographic segment. The study will then uncover details on “what are the water management practices and trends in village X.” Note, however, that it will not cover any investigative information about “why” the patterns exist.
Table of Contents
What is descriptive research?
If you’ve been wondering “What is descriptive research,” we’ve got you covered in this post! In a nutshell, descriptive research is an exploratory research method that helps a researcher describe a population, circumstance, or phenomenon. It can help answer what , where , when and how questions, but not why questions. In other words, it does not involve changing the study variables and does not seek to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
Importance of descriptive research
Now, let’s delve into the importance of descriptive research. This research method acts as the cornerstone for various academic and applied disciplines. Its primary significance lies in its ability to provide a comprehensive overview of a phenomenon, enabling researchers to gain a nuanced understanding of the variables at play. This method aids in forming hypotheses, generating insights, and laying the groundwork for further in-depth investigations. The following points further illustrate its importance:
Provides insights into a population or phenomenon: Descriptive research furnishes a comprehensive overview of the characteristics and behaviors of a specific population or phenomenon, thereby guiding and shaping the research project.
Offers baseline data: The data acquired through this type of research acts as a reference for subsequent investigations, laying the groundwork for further studies.
Allows validation of sampling methods: Descriptive research validates sampling methods, aiding in the selection of the most effective approach for the study.
Helps reduce time and costs: It is cost-effective and time-efficient, making this an economical means of gathering information about a specific population or phenomenon.
Ensures replicability: Descriptive research is easily replicable, ensuring a reliable way to collect and compare information from various sources.
When to use descriptive research design?
Determining when to use descriptive research depends on the nature of the research question. Before diving into the reasons behind an occurrence, understanding the how, when, and where aspects is essential. Descriptive research design is a suitable option when the research objective is to discern characteristics, frequencies, trends, and categories without manipulating variables. It is therefore often employed in the initial stages of a study before progressing to more complex research designs. To put it in another way, descriptive research precedes the hypotheses of explanatory research. It is particularly valuable when there is limited existing knowledge about the subject.
Some examples are as follows, highlighting that these questions would arise before a clear outline of the research plan is established:
- In the last two decades, what changes have occurred in patterns of urban gardening in Mumbai?
- What are the differences in climate change perceptions of farmers in coastal versus inland villages in the Philippines?
Characteristics of descriptive research
Coming to the characteristics of descriptive research, this approach is characterized by its focus on observing and documenting the features of a subject. Specific characteristics are as below.
- Quantitative nature: Some descriptive research types involve quantitative research methods to gather quantifiable information for statistical analysis of the population sample.
- Qualitative nature: Some descriptive research examples include those using the qualitative research method to describe or explain the research problem.
- Observational nature: This approach is non-invasive and observational because the study variables remain untouched. Researchers merely observe and report, without introducing interventions that could impact the subject(s).
- Cross-sectional nature: In descriptive research, different sections belonging to the same group are studied, providing a “snapshot” of sorts.
- Springboard for further research: The data collected are further studied and analyzed using different research techniques. This approach helps guide the suitable research methods to be employed.
Types of descriptive research
There are various descriptive research types, each suited to different research objectives. Take a look at the different types below.
- Surveys: This involves collecting data through questionnaires or interviews to gather qualitative and quantitative data.
- Observational studies: This involves observing and collecting data on a particular population or phenomenon without influencing the study variables or manipulating the conditions. These may be further divided into cohort studies, case studies, and cross-sectional studies:
- Cohort studies: Also known as longitudinal studies, these studies involve the collection of data over an extended period, allowing researchers to track changes and trends.
- Case studies: These deal with a single individual, group, or event, which might be rare or unusual.
- Cross-sectional studies : A researcher collects data at a single point in time, in order to obtain a snapshot of a specific moment.
- Focus groups: In this approach, a small group of people are brought together to discuss a topic. The researcher moderates and records the group discussion. This can also be considered a “participatory” observational method.
- Descriptive classification: Relevant to the biological sciences, this type of approach may be used to classify living organisms.
Descriptive research methods
Several descriptive research methods can be employed, and these are more or less similar to the types of approaches mentioned above.
- Surveys: This method involves the collection of data through questionnaires or interviews. Surveys may be done online or offline, and the target subjects might be hyper-local, regional, or global.
- Observational studies: These entail the direct observation of subjects in their natural environment. These include case studies, dealing with a single case or individual, as well as cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, for a glimpse into a population or changes in trends over time, respectively. Participatory observational studies such as focus group discussions may also fall under this method.
Researchers must carefully consider descriptive research methods, types, and examples to harness their full potential in contributing to scientific knowledge.
Examples of descriptive research
Now, let’s consider some descriptive research examples.
- In social sciences, an example could be a study analyzing the demographics of a specific community to understand its socio-economic characteristics.
- In business, a market research survey aiming to describe consumer preferences would be a descriptive study.
- In ecology, a researcher might undertake a survey of all the types of monocots naturally occurring in a region and classify them up to species level.
These examples showcase the versatility of descriptive research across diverse fields.
Advantages of descriptive research
There are several advantages to this approach, which every researcher must be aware of. These are as follows:
- Owing to the numerous descriptive research methods and types, primary data can be obtained in diverse ways and be used for developing a research hypothesis .
- It is a versatile research method and allows flexibility.
- Detailed and comprehensive information can be obtained because the data collected can be qualitative or quantitative.
- It is carried out in the natural environment, which greatly minimizes certain types of bias and ethical concerns.
- It is an inexpensive and efficient approach, even with large sample sizes
Disadvantages of descriptive research
On the other hand, this design has some drawbacks as well:
- It is limited in its scope as it does not determine cause-and-effect relationships.
- The approach does not generate new information and simply depends on existing data.
- Study variables are not manipulated or controlled, and this limits the conclusions to be drawn.
- Descriptive research findings may not be generalizable to other populations.
- Finally, it offers a preliminary understanding rather than an in-depth understanding.
To reiterate, the advantages of descriptive research lie in its ability to provide a comprehensive overview, aid hypothesis generation, and serve as a preliminary step in the research process. However, its limitations include a potential lack of depth, inability to establish cause-and-effect relationships, and susceptibility to bias.
Frequently asked questions
When should researchers conduct descriptive research.
Descriptive research is most appropriate when researchers aim to portray and understand the characteristics of a phenomenon without manipulating variables. It is particularly valuable in the early stages of a study.
What is the difference between descriptive and exploratory research?
Descriptive research focuses on providing a detailed depiction of a phenomenon, while exploratory research aims to explore and generate insights into an issue where little is known.
What is the difference between descriptive and experimental research?
Descriptive research observes and documents without manipulating variables, whereas experimental research involves intentional interventions to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
Is descriptive research only for social sciences?
No, various descriptive research types may be applicable to all fields of study, including social science, humanities, physical science, and biological science.
How important is descriptive research?
The importance of descriptive research lies in its ability to provide a glimpse of the current state of a phenomenon, offering valuable insights and establishing a basic understanding. Further, the advantages of descriptive research include its capacity to offer a straightforward depiction of a situation or phenomenon, facilitate the identification of patterns or trends, and serve as a useful starting point for more in-depth investigations. Additionally, descriptive research can contribute to the development of hypotheses and guide the formulation of research questions for subsequent studies.
Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.
Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place – Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Descriptive statistics can be used to describe a single variable (univariate analysis) or more than one variable (bivariate/multivariate analysis). In the case of more than one variable, descriptive statistics can help summarize relationships between variables using tools such as scatter plots.
A descriptive research design can use a wide variety of research methods to investigate one or more variables. Unlike in experimental research, the researcher does not control or manipulate any of the variables, but only observes and measures them.
In descriptive-comparative research, the researcher considers 2 variables that are not manipulated, and establish a formal procedure to conclude that one is better than the other. For example, an examination body wants to determine the better method of conducting tests between paper-based and computer-based tests.
A manipulated variable is a variable that we change or “manipulate” to see how that change affects some other variable. A manipulated variable is also sometimes called an independent variable. A response variable is the variable that changes as a result of the manipulated variable being changed.
Unlike experimental research, where variables are manipulated to observe outcomes, descriptive research deals with the "as-is" scenario to facilitate further research by providing a framework or new insights on which continuing studies can build.
In an experimental research design, the variables of interest are called the independent variable (or variables) and the dependent variable. The independent variable in an experiment is the causing variable that is created (manipulated) by the experimenter.
Researchers should study types of variables before determining statistical tests to obtain relevant measures and valid study results. There is a recommendation to consult a statistician to ensure appropriate usage of the statistical design based on the variables and that the assumptions are upheld.
Descriptive research observes and documents without manipulating variables, whereas experimental research involves intentional interventions to establish cause-and-effect relationships. Is descriptive research only for social sciences?
As we learned earlier in a descriptive study, variables are not manipulated. They are observed as they naturally occur and then associations between variables are studied.
As we learned earlier in a descriptive study, variables are not manipulated. They are observed as they naturally occur and then associations between variables are studied.