Uncovering the sustainability reporting: bibliometric analysis and future research directions
- Original Article
- Published: 11 December 2023
- Volume 21 , pages 520–542, ( 2024 )
Cite this article
- Pooja Mishra ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0689-3247 1 &
- Kishore Kumar 2
543 Accesses
Explore all metrics
In the past two decades, corporate sustainability reporting has witnessed tremendous growth and garnered a lot of attention among scholars, and practitioners around the world. It is no longer a matter of choice for companies due to immense pressure from various stakeholders to adopt sustainability practices. This article aims to analyze key research themes in Sustainability Reporting and its disclosure from 2002 to 2022, assess their impact, track field evolution, and identify emerging areas for future study. The data have been collected from the SCOPUS database using relevant keywords and utilized VOSviewer and Biblioshiny tools for bibliometric analysis, including citation trends, authorship patterns, and keyword frequency. This study reveals a surge in scholarly literature since 2012, with prominent clusters in sustainable development, sustainability, decision-making, and stakeholder engagement. “CSR” emerges as the dominant keyword. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of existing scholarly work in the field of sustainability reporting, highlights emerging trends, and suggests future research directions in corporate sustainability. It also provides practical implications for organizations, policymakers, and stakeholders, bridging the theory–practice gap and enhancing research’s practical value.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
Sustainability reporting scholarly research: a bibliometric review and a future research agenda
Thirty years of sustainability reporting research: a scientometric analysis
Sustainability Literature Orientation: Evidence from Finance Academic Research
Adams, C.A., and G.R. Frost. 2008. Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum 32 (4): 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002 .
Article Google Scholar
Akisik, O., and G. Gal. 2014. Financial Performance and Reviews of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports. Journal of Management Control 25 (3–4): 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-014-0198-2 .
Ananzeh, H., et al. 2022. The impact of corporate governance on forward-looking CSR disclosure. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting . https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-10-2021-0379 .
Appio, F.P., F. Cesaroni, and A. Di Minin. 2014. Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature. Scientometrics 101 (1): 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-014-1329-0 .
Aras, G., and D. Crowther. 2008. Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1): 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-008-9806-0 .
Azim, M., E. Ahmed, and B. D’Netto. 2011. Corporate social disclosure in Bangladesh: a study of the financial sector. International Review of Business Research Papers 7 (2): 37–55.
Google Scholar
Baumüller, J., and K. Sopp. 2022. Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 23 (1): 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0114/FULL/PDF .
Buchholz, R.A., and S.B. Rosenthal. 2005. Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-005-1393-8 .
Cacciamani, G.E., et al. 2023. PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcare. Nature Medicine 29 (1): 14–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02139-w .
Castriotta, M., et al. 2018. What’s in a name? exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations. Scientometrics 118 (2): 407–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-018-2977-2 .
Castriotta, M., et al. 2019. What’s in a name? exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations. Scientometrics 118 (2): 407–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-018-2977-2/FIGURES/3 .
Chi, L.C. 2009. Do transparency and disclosure predict firm performance? evidence from the Taiwan market. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (8): 11198–11203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2009.02.099 .
Christensen, H.B., L. Hail, and C. Leuz. 2021. Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies 26 (3): 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11142-021-09609-5 .
Cisneros, L., et al. 2018. Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: mapping and analyzing authors’ networks. Scientometrics 117 (2): 919–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-018-2889-1 .
Cobo, M.J., et al. 2011. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (7): 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.21525 .
Cronin, B., and Y. Ding. 2011. Popular and/or prestigious? measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing & Management 47 (1): 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IPM.2010.01.002) .
Di Leo, A., et al. 2023. Sustainability reporting practices: an explorative analysis of luxury fashion brands. Management Decision . https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2022-0142/FULL/PDF .
Dienes, D., R. Sassen, and J. Fischer. 2016. What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? a systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 7 (2): 154–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2014-0050 .
Ding, Y., et al. 2009. PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11): 2229–2243. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.21171 .
Dissanayake, D., C. Tilt, and M. Xydias-Lobo. 2016. Sustainability reporting by publicly listed companies in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cleaner Production 129: 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.04.086 .
Doni, F., A. Corvino, and S. Bianchi Martini. 2022. Corporate governance model, stakeholder engagement and social issues evidence from European oil and gas industry. Social Responsibility Journal 18 (3): 636–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2020-0336/FULL/PDF .
Du, S., C.B. Bhattacharya, and S. Sen. 2010. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276 .
Durst, S., and M. Leyer. 2022. The influence of institutional conditions on firms’ process innovation–evidence from firms based on a multi-country analysis. Bottom Line 35 (4): 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-11-2021-0105/FULL/PDF .
Ertz, M., and S. Leblanc-Proulx. 2018. Sustainability in the collaborative economy: a bibliometric analysis reveals emerging interest. Journal of Cleaner Production 196: 1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.06.095 .
Fahimnia, B., J. Sarkis, and H. Davarzani. 2015. Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics 162: 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2015.01.003 .
Farooq, M.B. 2017. The market for sustainability assurance services: a comprehensive review of the literature and future avenues for research. Pacific Accounting Review 29 (1): 79–106.
Ferenhof, H.A., et al. 2015. Intellectual capital dimensions: state of the art in 2014. Journal of Intellectual Capital 16 (1): 58–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2014-0021 .
Fifka, M.S. 2013. Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective–a review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment 22 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.729 .
Frost, G., et al. 2005. A survey of sustainability reporting practices of Australian reporting entities. Australian Accounting Review 15 (35): 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1835-2561.2005.TB00256.X .
(Global Reporting Initiative [GRI] (2023) The external assurance of sustainability reporting. Available at: www.globalreporting.org (Accessed: 27 Aug 2023).
Gull, A.A., et al. 2023. Co-opted directors and greenhouse gas emissions: does ESG compensation matter? Journal of Cleaner Production 411: 137192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2023.137192 .
Hackston, D., and M.J. Milne. 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9 (1): 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109987 .
Haddaway, N.R., et al. 2022. PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews 18 (2): e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/CL2.1230 .
Hahn, R., and M. Kühnen. 2013. Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production 59: 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.07.005 .
Hamrouni, A., A. Miloudi, and R. Benkraiem. 2015. Signaling firm performance through corporate voluntary disclosure. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 31 (2): 609–620. https://doi.org/10.19030/JABR.V31I2.9157 .
Herzig, C., and S. Schaltegger. 2006. Corporate sustainability reporting: an overview. Sustainability Accounting and Reporting . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_13/COVER .
Ibáñez-Forés, V., et al. 2023. ‘How do organisations communicate aspects related to their social performance? A proposed set of indicators and metrics for sustainability reporting. Sustainable Production and Consumption 35: 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2022.10.024 .
Imperiale, F., S. Pizzi, and S. Lippolis. 2023. Sustainability reporting and ESG performance in the utilities sector. Utilities Policy 80: 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JUP.2022.101468 .
Jamil, A., N.A. Mohd Ghazali, and S. Puat Nelson. 2021. The influence of corporate governance structure on sustainability reporting in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal 17 (8): 1251–1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2020-0310/FULL/PDF .
Jiao, Y. 2011. Corporate disclosure, market valuation, and firm performance. Financial Management 40 (3): 647–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1755-053X.2011.01156.X .
Jones, P., D. Hillier, and D. Comfort. 2016. Materiality and external assurance in corporate sustainability reporting: An exploratory study of Europe’s leading commercial property companies. Journal of European Real Estate Research 9 (2): 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-07-2015-0027 .
Jordão, R.V.D., and J.C. Novas. 2022. Information and knowledge management intellectual capital, and sustainable growth in networked small and medium enterprises. Journal of the Knowledge Economy . https://doi.org/10.1007/S13132-022-01043-5/TABLES/8 .
Jordão, R.V.D., V.R. de Almeida, and J. Novas. 2022. Intellectual capital, sustainable economic and financial performance and value creation in emerging markets: the case of Brazil. Bottom Line 35 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-11-2021-0103/FULL/XML .
Karaman, A.S., M. Kilic, and A. Uyar. 2018. Sustainability reporting in the aviation industry: worldwide evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 9 (4): 362–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2017-0150 .
Khandelwal, C., et al. 2019. Financial risk reporting practices: systematic literature review and research agenda. Bottom Line 32 (3): 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2019-0071/FULL/XML .
Kolk, A. 2003. Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment 12 (5): 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.370 .
Kolk, A. 2010. Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs. Journal of World Business 45 (4): 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JWB.2009.08.001 .
Kumar, K., R. Kumari, and R. Kumar. 2021. The state of corporate sustainability reporting in India: evidence from environmentally sensitive industries. Business and Society Review 126 (4): 513–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/BASR.12247 .
Kumar, K., et al. 2022. Do ownership structures and governance attributes matter for corporate sustainability reporting? an examination in the Indian context. Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal 33 (5): 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2021-0196/FULL/PDF .
Kuzey, C., and A. Uyar. 2017. Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.12.153 .
Laplume, A.O., K. Sonpar, and R.A. Litz. 2008. Stakeholder theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management 34 (6): 1152–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324322 .
Li, C., K. Wu, and J. Wu. 2017. A bibliometric analysis of research on haze during 2000–2016. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 24733–24742.
Lyon, T.P., and J.W. Maxwell. 2011. Greenwash: corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 20 (1): 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1530-9134.2010.00282.X .
Meseguer-Sánchez, V., et al. 2020. The role of women in a family economy A bibliometric analysis in contexts of poverty. Sustainability 12 (24): 10328. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU122410328 .
Mishra, P., T.G. Sant, and K. Kumar. 2023. Carbon disclosure and organization performance: a literature review. Sustainability and Climate Change 16 (4): 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1089/SCC.2023.0018 .
Moher, D., et al. 2016. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola De Nutricion Humana y Dietetica 20 (2): 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1/TABLES/4 .
Murthy, V. 2008. Corporate social disclosure practices of top software firms in India. Global Business Review 9 (2): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090800900201 .
Naciti, V., F. Cesaroni, and L. Pulejo. 2022. Corporate governance and sustainability: a review of the existing literature. Journal of Management and Governance 26 (1): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10997-020-09554-6/METRICS .
Narang, N., S. Gupta, and N. Tripathy. 2023. A bibliometric analysis of governance mechanisms in dividend decisions: an overview and emerging trends. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 20: 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41310-023-00184-6/METRICS .
Nasreen, T., R. Baker, and D. Rezania. 2023. Sustainability reporting–a systematic review of various dimensions, theoretical and methodological underpinnings. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting . https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2022-0029/FULL/PDF .
Nguyen, V.T., and C.T.H. Nguyen. 2023. A systematic review of structural equation modeling in augmented reality applications. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 28 (1): 328–338. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v28.i1.pp328-338 .
Niñerola, A., M.V. Sánchez-Rebull, and A.B. Hernández-Lara. 2019. Tourism research on sustainability: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 11 (5): 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11051377 .
Nobanee, H., et al. 2021. A bibliometric analysis of sustainability and risk management. Sustainability 13 (6): 3277. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13063277 .
Orazalin, N., and M. Mahmood. 2020. Determinants of GRI-based sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 10 (1): 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12-2018-0137/REFERENCES .
Page, L., and S. Brin. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks 30 (1–7): 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X .
Page, M.J., et al. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine 18 (3): 105906. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003583 .
Palacios-Callender, M., and S.A. Roberts. 2018. Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: understanding relations between origin and destination countries. Scientometrics 117 (2): 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-018-2888-2 .
Rahman, H.U., M. Zahid, and M.A.S. Al-Faryan. 2023. ESG and firm performance: the rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production 404: 136859. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2023.136859 .
Raman, S.R. 2016. Corporate social reporting in India—a view from the top. Global Business Review 7 (2): 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090600700208 .
Rasul, T., et al. 2022. Advertising expenditure and stock performance: a bibliometric analysis. Finance Research Letters 50: 103283. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2022.103283 .
Riehmann, P., Hanfler, M. and Froehlich, B. (2005) ‘Interactive sankey diagrams’, Proceedings-IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFO VIS , pp. 233–240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532152 .
Roca, L.C., and C. Searcy. 2012. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production 20 (1): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.08.002 .
Sharif, S.P., and M. Ming Lai. 2015. The effects of corporate disclosure practices on firm performance, risk and dividend policy’. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 12 (4): 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1057/JDG.2015.2 .
Tauringana, V. 2021. Sustainability reporting challenges in developing countries: towards management perceptions research evidence-based practices. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 11 (2): 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-01-2020-0007 .
Tranfield, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management 14 (3): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 .
Tripathi, P.M., V. Chotia, U. Solanki, R. Meena, and V. Khandelwal. 2023. Economic value added research: mapping thematic structure and research trends. Risks 11 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11010009 .
Trivedi, K., and K.B.L. Srivastava. 2022. The role of knowledge management processes in leveraging competitive strategies to achieve firm innovativeness. Bottom Line 35 (2–3): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-06-2021-0071/FULL/XML .
Tunger, D., and M. Eulerich. 2018. Bibliometric analysis of corporate governance research in German-speaking countries: applying bibliometrics to business research using a custom-made database. Scientometrics 117 (3): 2041–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-018-2919-Z .
van Eck, N.J., and L. Waltman. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 (2): 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-009-0146-3/FIGURES/7 .
Vila, M., and S. Moya. 2023. Social sustainability reporting in European business schools. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 14 (1): 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2022-0100/FULL/PDF .
Xie, H., et al. 2020. A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: current status, development, and future directions. Land 9 (1): 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9010028 .
Zemigala, M. 2019. Tendencies in research on sustainable development in management sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production 218: 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.02.009 .
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
GLA University, Mathura, India
Pooja Mishra
School of Business and Management, Christ (Deemed to be University), Delhi NCR Campus, Ghaziabad, India
Kishore Kumar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Pooja Mishra .
Additional information
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Mishra, P., Kumar, K. Uncovering the sustainability reporting: bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Int J Discl Gov 21 , 520–542 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00216-1
Download citation
Received : 23 June 2023
Accepted : 17 November 2023
Published : 11 December 2023
Issue Date : December 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00216-1
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Sustainability reporting
- Sustainability disclosure
- Bibliometric analysis
- Sustainable development
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
COMMENTS
Sustainability reporting is measuring, disclosing, and being accountable to internal and external stakeholders for organizational performance toward sustainable development.
Hahn and Kuhnen's [128] publication examine the determinants of sustainability reporting and identifies gaps and opportunities for further research in SDG 9 and SDG 12. Milne and Gray's study [130] critiques the disconnect between sustainability reporting and the ecological systems it aims to protect, emphasizing the importance of SR for SDG 9.
Despite the substantial increase in sustainability reporting scholarly research, the comprehensive evaluation of scientific production in this area is scarce. This study combines the bibliometric and content analyses of sustainability reporting research to fill this gap. We map the development, conceptual structure, and thematic evolution of sustainability reporting scholarly research based on ...
The rationale is that the sustainability report is influenced by governance practices, social responsibility, and environmental impact. ... It is driven by the desire to stay current with the latest research on sustainability reporting, and all of the findings are closely related to the actual obstacles that SMEs face nowadays. The strategy of ...
The multitude of environmental, economic, and social crises spanning the last 40 years has precipitated a heightened call for research in the field of SR (Carnegie 2012; Humphrey and Gendron 2015; Unerman and Bennett 2004; Qian et al. 2021).Sustainability reporting (SR) research has gained substantial momentum due to its consequential implications in social, economic, and political domains ...
Sustainability Reporting (SR, hereafter) research is trending because of its substantial impact on socio-cultural, economics, and politics (Antonini, Beck, and Larrinaga 2020; Cho 2015; Gray 2000 ...
sustainability reporting activities even if they do not cover the entire range of sustainability dimensions in a single report. This is a non - copy - edited version of the article published by ...
In the past two decades, corporate sustainability reporting has witnessed tremendous growth and garnered a lot of attention among scholars, and practitioners around the world. It is no longer a matter of choice for companies due to immense pressure from various stakeholders to adopt sustainability practices. This article aims to analyze key research themes in Sustainability Reporting and its ...
Research on sustainability reporting is becoming increasingly important. Despite the growing body of literature on sustainability reporting, little is known about its past trends and how research areas might evolve in the future. Recognizing and understanding the research trend related to sustainability reporting will enable future researchers to plan and conduct research that is of high ...
This paper aims to investigate the latest scientific developments, map research networks and topics, and present a critical analysis of the gaps and future opportunities in the literature on the readability of sustainability reports. Through data collection and filtering processes, the final sample included 10 articles. Then, a bibliometric analysis was developed using Scopus metrics and AJG ...