research is based on

The Dyslexia Initiative

Advocating. educating. inspiring. empowering., join the #dyslexiarevolution, research v evidence, what does it all really mean.

by Ashley Roberts

A question that comes up a great deal within our community is what is the difference between evidence-based and research-based programs? This is a fair question that deserves a proper answer. Alyssa Ciarlante defines them as:

" Evidence-Based Practices or Evidence-Based Programs refer to individual practices (for example, single lessons or in-class activities) or programs (for example, year-long curricula) that are considered effective based on scientific evidence. To deem a program or practice “evidence-based,” researchers will typically study the impact of the resource(s) in a controlled setting, for example, they may study differences in skill growth between students whose educators used the resources and students whose educators did not. If sufficient research suggests that the program or practice is effective, it may be deemed “evidence-based.”

Evidence-Informed, also known as Research-Based, Practices are practices which were developed based on the best research available in the field. This means that users can feel confident that the strategies and activities included in the program or practice have a strong scientific basis for their use. Unlike Evidence-Based Practices or Programs, Research-Based Practices have not been researched in a controlled setting.

Terms like “evidence-based” or “research-based” are useful indicators of the type of evidence that exists behind programs, practices, or assessments, however, they can only tell us so much about the specific research behind each tool. For situations where more information on a resource’s evidence base would be beneficial, it may be helpful to request research summaries or articles from the resource’s publisher for further review, but regardless, evidence-based is the preferred method, not researched-based."

That might be clear as mud so let' try this approach from the Child Welfare Information Gateway:

"Evidence-based practices are approaches to prevention or treatment that are validated by some form of documented scientific evidence. This includes findings established through controlled clinical studies , but other methods of establishing evidence are valid as well.

Evidence-based programs use a defined curriculum or set of services that, when implemented with fidelity as a whole, has been validated by some form of scientific evidence. Evidence-based practices and programs may be described as "supported" or "well-supported", depending on the strength of the research design.

Evidence-informed practices use the best available research and practice knowledge to guide program design and implementation. This informed practice allows for innovation while incorporating the lessons learned from the existing research literature. Ideally, evidence-based and evidence-informed programs and practices should be individualized."

And then let's put it through this lens:

Science-based - Parts or components of the program or method are based on Science.

Research-based - Parts or components of the program or method are based on practices demonstrated effective through Research.

Evidence-based - The entire program or method has been demonstrated through Research to be effective.

What this boils down to is that evidence-based is PREFERRED over research-based. Think of it this way, evidence-based means significant studies were performed, with control groups, meeting the criteria of scientific research, and that the results were repeatable numerous times with minimal variation. Research-based means someone stands on the shoulders of the giants who did the work for the evidence to create something based off of the evidence, but it isn't put through the same rigors. It can be though and that's a very clear distinction. Research-based programs can be studied until they become evidence-based, but not all are.

Now the challenge is, when being presented with remediation plans for your child, in differentiating between the two, and knowing which one is being used with your child. We at DI are keen advocates in knowing exactly what program(s) schools are using with your child, and while you should ask if it's evidence or research-based, it is also up to you to find that data yourself by calling the

publisher. The publisher should be willing to turn over the data, if not, let that be a sign that something is amiss.

Now, in Overcoming Dyslexia, Dr. Sally Shaywitz refers to the What Works Clearinghouse for referencing which programs are evidence v research based.

(https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/) "The What Works Clearinghouse is an investment of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) within the U.S. Department of Education that was established in 2002. The work of the WWC is managed by a team of staff at IES and conducted under a set of contracts held by several leading firms with expertise in education, research methodology, and the dissemination of education research. Follow the links to find more information about the key staff from American Institutes for Research, Mathematica Policy Research, Abt Associates, and Development Services Group, Inc who contribute to the WWC investment."

The issue here is that too many question the validity of WWC. Programs like Fountas and Pinnell and other balanced literacy programs are given high marks, while some well known dyslexia programs are not, if they're even included at all.

So then what is a parent to do?

As stated, get the evidence or research, whichever is available, from the publisher and with an understanding of scientific principles and methodologies, review the evidence with a discerning eye. Ask questions like how many children were in the trials? If it's 5 then the findings can't be very legitimate. If enough children were used to make up a large enough statistical pool then the findings are more valid. This is just an example, but a key one within educational data that must always be at the forefront. Why? Too many papers exist calling programs / data "research-based" when in fact scientific principles and statistical modeling were not followed correctly therefore the data upon which the programs are based is in essence invalid. As you start to look at the data, you will start to see what to look for, i.e. what questions to ask.

But, this brings up an important point that we've had to repeat a few times lately, at DI we do not recommend or back any programs. We are parent advocates, not researchers and we do not possess the expertise we believe is necessary to do so. We defer to the list of approved programs that The International Dyslexia Association has already defined.

References :

“Evidence-Based” vs. “Research-Based”: Understanding the Differences, https://apertureed.com/evidence-based-vs-research-based-understanding-differences/

Child Welfare Information Gateway, https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/management/practice-improvement/evidence/ebp/definitions/

Evidence Based Assessment, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17716047/

ESSA, https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdf

Science-based, Research-based, Evidence-based: What's the difference?, https://www.dynaread.com/science-based-research-based-evidence-based

Recent Posts

A Response to Lucy's Rebranding Following Columbia University's Retreat From Her Curriculum

Lucy’s Misguided Desire For An Apology

Phoenix Rising

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Plan Your Visit

Evidence-Based? Research-Based? What does it all Mean?

Have you ever felt puzzled by trying to discern the difference between the terms, evidence-based and research-based ? Or have you ever found yourself feeling intimidated when someone asked you, “But is that program/practice evidence-based?” I know I have. To help me clarify my understanding, I reached out to my colleagues here at the Center and my old friend, Google. I’ve come to the following understandings and a bit of friendly advice – stay curious! Please keep reading if you’re feeling as perplexed as I am.

Clarifying the Difference between Research-Based and Evidence-Based

My current working definition of research-based instruction has come to mean those practices/programs that are based on well-supported and documented theories of learning. The instructional approach is based on research that supports the principles it incorporates, but there may not be specific research or its own evidence to directly demonstrate its effectiveness.

Defining evidence-based practice has been more headache-inducing as the term is frequently and widely used to mean a myriad of things. Currently, I have come to understand that evidence-based practices are those that have been researched with either experimental studies (think randomly assigned control groups), quasi-experimental studies (comparison groups that are not randomized), or studies that were well-designed and well-implemented correlational studies with statistical controls for selection bias. In brief, a specific study (or studies) has been done to test its effectiveness.

By no means are these definitions ready for Merriam-Webster, but they are helping me to make sense of the terms.

So what do you say or ask when “research” is thrown your way?

Recently, I met with a group of literacy coaches and we discussed how to respond when a fellow educator approaches them with “research” either supporting or refuting an instructional practice or program. My best advice to them probably sounded like a Viking River Cruise commercial – “Be curious!” Below are some examples of ways to respond to demonstrate that you are open to learning more.

• Thank you for bringing that information to my attention. Can you share your source of information or the article so I can read it too and we can talk about it together?
• Please talk more about what you have learned (or read or heard). I’m curious to learn more about: a. Whether the research was published in a peer-reviewed journal or if the research was sponsored by a publisher or other interested party. b. The sample size or the number of schools/students involved in the study. c. The demographics of the subjects involved in the study. d. The type of research conducted.

3. I’m wondering how many studies have been conducted that replicate those results. 4. That research sounds important. Can you share the source with me? Perhaps it will be helpful for our grade level team to read it and discuss the findings together.

As educators, we are always looking for the most effective ways to support our students. Stay open to new findings and be sure to slow the process down so you probe deeper to learn if there truly is current research to back what people are claiming. Then be sure to evaluate the credibility of the source of information, the methods or processes used to critique or research, and don’t forget to rely upon trusted sources like What Works Clearinghouse . You might also appreciate a lecture presented by Maren Aukerman that discusses comprehensive, research-informed literacy instruction . The more you dig, the more you may find that many practices and programs touted as evidence-based are either based on personal anecdotes and stories or the research base is flimsy at best.

You might also be interested in

Celebrating the Season: New and Diverse Holiday Books for the PK–6 Classroom 

Read on to discover some fantastic books about the holidays to bring diversity into your classroom this season.

Reading Aloud to Children: The Future is in Our Hands

Research shows that reading aloud to children is the one of the best ways to encourage a literate life.

Navigating Standardized Assessment: Approaching Testing as a Genre

Standardized testing is a reality in our students’ lives. Are you wondering how you can support your students in demonstrating all they know on the test but not stop the rich, ongoing literacy instruction months before the test?

If you have any questions, please contact the Center.

Phone: 617.349.8424

Hours: 8:00 am–5:00 pm

Mailing Address Lesley University 29 Everett Street Cambridge, MA 02138

• American Career College
• ACC Library

What is Research and Evidence-based Practice?

• Research Basics
• Peer-reviewed Sources
• Evidence-Based Practice
• Types of Sources

What is Research?

In the medical and allied health fields, researchers conduct scientifically-designed experiments to answer   specific research questions.  E ach study  builds on previous research to add a new piece of evidence to the larger puzzle.   The goal of health research is to improve understanding of a particular field or subject area in order to improve technology, care, and decision-making .  

What is Evidence-based Practice?

As a practitioner, it's important to develop an evidence-based practice (EBP).  EBP focuses on using  current evidence  derived from  clinical research studies  and analysis, in combination with a practitioner's own  experience  and  judgement .  It's a three-part approach called the three-legged stool of EBP .   The three legs are clinical research, clinical experience, and the patient's preferences.  

Clinical research can usually be found in peer-reviewed sources , such as peer-reviewed journal databases.  

Read more  about EBP in a peer-reviewed article from Credo Reference..

What Does Peer-Reviewed Mean?

Peer-reviewed sources  are sources that have been reviewed for quality by experts and professionals according to industry best practices.  Peer reviewed sources are reviewed before they are published , which is different than many websites.  All of the links to library collections are peer-reviewed.   This means that you can generally trust information from the library's collections more than the information on the Web.  

Reference Sources

Reference sources summarize research information in easy-to-understand articles.  You're probably familiar with reference sources like Wikipedia and imdb.com.  For evidence-based practice, you'll have to use peer-reviewed health care reference sites.  Check out our online reference collections .

Images & Media

Of course we find images and stream videos online all the time from YouTube and social media sites.  You want to make sure health care images and videos are professionally created by experts in the field.  Check out our online image and media collections .

Peer-reviewed Journals

Peer-reviewed journals are the best source of research evidence.  They're where health researchers publish results of research studies testing the effectiveness of drugs, interventions, and practices.  

The best peer-reviewed journals aren't usually free, though, so you can't find them through Google.  Since the school buys subscriptions, you can access them for free through the library.  Check out our peer-reviewed journal collections ..

• Next: Peer-reviewed Sources >>
• Last Updated: Dec 23, 2021 1:48 PM
• URL: https://guides.americancareercollege.edu/evidence

What is Research? Definition, Types, Methods and Process

By Nick Jain

Published on: July 25, 2023

Table of Contents

What is Research?

Types of research methods, research process: how to conduct research, top 10 best practices for conducting research in 2023.

Research is defined as a meticulous and systematic inquiry process designed to explore and unravel specific subjects or issues with precision. This methodical approach encompasses the thorough collection, rigorous analysis, and insightful interpretation of information, aiming to delve deep into the nuances of a chosen field of study. By adhering to established research methodologies, investigators can draw meaningful conclusions, fostering a profound understanding that contributes significantly to the existing knowledge base.

This dedication to systematic inquiry serves as the bedrock of progress, steering advancements across sciences, technology, social sciences, and diverse disciplines. Through the dissemination of meticulously gathered insights, scholars not only inspire collaboration and innovation but also catalyze positive societal change.

In the pursuit of knowledge, researchers embark on a journey of discovery, seeking to unravel the complexities of the world around us. By formulating clear research questions, researchers set the course for their investigations, carefully crafting methodologies to gather relevant data. Whether employing quantitative surveys or qualitative interviews, data collection lies at the heart of every research endeavor. Once the data is collected, researchers meticulously analyze it, employing statistical tools or thematic analysis to identify patterns and draw meaningful insights. These insights, often supported by empirical evidence, contribute to the collective pool of knowledge, enriching our understanding of various phenomena and guiding decision-making processes across diverse fields. Through research, we continually refine our understanding of the universe, laying the foundation for innovation and progress that shape the future.

Research embodies the spirit of curiosity and the pursuit of truth. Here are the key characteristics of research:

• Systematic Approach: Research follows a well-structured and organized approach, with clearly defined steps and methodologies. It is conducted in a systematic manner to ensure that data is collected, analyzed, and interpreted in a logical and coherent way.
• Objective and Unbiased: Research is objective and strives to be free from bias or personal opinions. Researchers aim to gather data and draw conclusions based on evidence rather than preconceived notions or beliefs.
• Empirical Evidence: Research relies on empirical evidence obtained through observations, experiments, surveys, or other data collection methods. This evidence serves as the foundation for drawing conclusions and making informed decisions.
• Clear Research Question or Problem: Every research study begins with a specific research question or problem that the researcher aims to address. This question provides focus and direction to the entire research process.
• Replicability: Good research should be replicable, meaning that other researchers should be able to conduct a similar study and obtain similar results when following the same methods.
• Transparency and Ethics: Research should be conducted with transparency, and researchers should adhere to ethical guidelines and principles. This includes obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring confidentiality, and avoiding any harm to participants or the environment.
• Generalizability: Researchers often aim for their findings to be generalizable to a broader population or context. This means that the results of the study can be applied beyond the specific sample or situation studied.
• Logical and Critical Thinking: Research involves critical thinking to analyze and interpret data, identify patterns, and draw meaningful conclusions. Logical reasoning is essential in formulating hypotheses and designing the study.
• Contribution to Knowledge: The primary purpose of research is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge in a particular field. Researchers aim to expand understanding, challenge existing theories, or propose new ideas.
• Peer Review and Publication: Research findings are typically subject to peer review by experts in the field before being published in academic journals or presented at conferences. This process ensures the quality and validity of the research.
• Iterative Process: Research is often an iterative process, with findings from one study leading to new questions and further research. It is a continuous cycle of discovery and refinement.
• Practical Application: While some research is theoretical in nature, much of it aims to have practical applications and real-world implications. It can inform policy decisions, improve practices, or address societal challenges.

These key characteristics collectively define research as a rigorous and valuable endeavor that drives progress, knowledge, and innovation in various disciplines.

Research serves as a cornerstone for knowledge discovery, innovation, and decision-making. Understanding the various types of research methods is crucial for selecting the most appropriate approach to answer your research questions effectively. This guide delves into the major research methods, their applications, and tips on choosing the best one for your study.

1. Quantitative Research: Unlocking the Power of Numbers

Quantitative research is centered around collecting numerical data and employing statistical techniques to draw conclusions. This type of research is often used to measure variables, identify patterns, and establish causal relationships.

• Purpose: Surveys are utilized to collect data from a large audience to identify trends and generalize findings.
• Method: Employ structured questionnaires with closed-ended questions.
• Example: Businesses conduct customer satisfaction surveys to understand consumer preferences and make informed decisions.
• Experiments:
• Purpose: Experiments are designed to test hypotheses by manipulating variables in a controlled setting.
• Method: Use experimental and control groups to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
• Example: In scientific research, experiments are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a new drug treatment.
• Observational Studies:
• Purpose: Observational studies involve watching and recording subjects without interference, providing insights into natural behaviors.
• Method: Systematically observe and document phenomena.
• Example: Wildlife researchers use observational studies to study animal behaviors in their natural habitats.
• Secondary Data Analysis:
• Purpose: Re-analyze existing datasets to extract new insights, saving time and resources.
• Method: Utilize pre-existing data from sources such as government databases or academic publications.
• Example: Economists analyze census data to examine employment trends and economic growth.

2. Qualitative Research: Exploring the Depths of Human Experience

Qualitative research focuses on understanding the intricacies of human experiences, beliefs, and social phenomena. It provides rich, in-depth insights and interpretations that numbers alone cannot capture.

• Interviews:
• Purpose: Conduct in-depth interviews to explore individual perspectives and gain insights into complex topics.
• Method: Use semi-structured or unstructured interviews to allow participants to share their thoughts freely.
• Example: Healthcare researchers interview patients to understand their experiences and emotional responses to treatments.
• Focus Groups:
• Purpose: Gather diverse opinions and insights from group discussions on specific topics.
• Method: Facilitate guided conversations with selected participants.
• Example: Marketing teams conduct focus groups to test new product concepts and gather feedback.
• Ethnography:
• Purpose: Immerse in a culture or community to understand their practices, values, and social dynamics.
• Method: Engage in long-term observation and interaction within the community.
• Example: Anthropologists conduct ethnographic research to study cultural rituals and traditions.
• Case Studies:
• Purpose: Provide an in-depth examination of a single subject, event, or organization to uncover insights and identify patterns.
• Method: Use multiple data sources to gain comprehensive knowledge.
• Example: Business analysts study successful startups to identify strategies for growth and innovation.

3. Mixed-Methods Research: Bridging the Gap

Mixed-methods research combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to gain a deeper insight into complex problems. This integration allows researchers to benefit from both numerical data and narrative insights.

• Purpose: Leverage the strengths of both quantitative and qualitative data.
• Method: Employ a combination of surveys, interviews, and other techniques.
• Example: Educational researchers use mixed methods to evaluate student performance through test scores and personal interviews.

4. Cross-Sectional Studies: Snapshot of a Moment

Cross-sectional studies analyze data from a population at a specific point in time to identify patterns, correlations, or differences between variables.

• Purpose: Provide a snapshot of a population’s characteristics and relationships.
• Method: Collect data simultaneously from multiple subjects.
• Example: Public health researchers conduct cross-sectional studies to assess disease prevalence in a community.

5. Longitudinal Studies: Observing Change Over Time

Longitudinal studies track the same subjects over an extended period, providing valuable insights into changes, trends, and long-term effects.

• Purpose: Examine changes and developments over time.
• Method: Collect data from the same participants at multiple intervals.
• Example: Psychologists conduct longitudinal studies to understand cognitive development from childhood to adulthood.

6. Action Research: Solving Real-World Problems

Action research involves collaboration with stakeholders to identify and address practical issues, aiming for immediate impact and improvement.

• Purpose: Implement solutions and drive change in real-world settings.
• Method: Engage participants actively in the research process.
• Example: Educators conduct action research to enhance teaching methods and student engagement.

7. Case-Control Studies: Uncovering Causes and Risks

Case-control studies compare individuals with a particular outcome (cases) to those without it (controls) to identify potential causes or risk factors.

• Purpose: Identify factors linked to specific outcomes or diseases.
• Method: Analyze historical data between cases and controls.
• Example: Epidemiologists conduct case-control studies to investigate potential causes of rare diseases.

8. Descriptive Research: Painting a Picture

Descriptive research aims to provide detailed descriptions and summaries of phenomena without manipulating variables, offering a clear picture of a subject.

• Purpose: Describe characteristics, behaviors, or patterns.
• Method: Use surveys, observations, or case studies.
• Example: Sociologists use descriptive research to document urban population demographics.

9. Correlational Research: Understanding Relationships

Correlational research examines the relationship between two or more variables to identify patterns, associations, or correlations without inferring causation.

• Purpose: Identify patterns and associations between variables.
• Method: Use statistical analysis to determine correlation coefficients.
• Example: Researchers study the correlation between physical activity levels and mental well-being.

10. Grounded Theory: Building Theories from Data

Grounded theory is an approach where theories are developed based on systematically gathered and analyzed data, allowing concepts and frameworks to emerge organically.

• Purpose: Develop theories grounded in empirical evidence.
• Method: Use iterative data collection and analysis.
• Example: Social scientists build theories on workplace motivation through employee interviews and observations.

11. Surveys and Questionnaires: Collecting Direct Feedback

Surveys and questionnaires are structured tools used to collect specific information directly from a target population, providing valuable data for various purposes.

• Purpose: Gather targeted data and opinions from respondents.
• Method: Administer standardized questions to a sample population.
• Example: Market researchers use surveys to gather feedback on consumer preferences and trends.

12. Meta-Analysis: Synthesizing Evidence

Meta-analysis is a powerful statistical technique that combines the results of multiple studies on a similar topic to draw robust conclusions and insights.

• Purpose: Synthesize existing research findings for stronger conclusions.
• Method: Aggregate and analyze data from numerous studies.
• Example: Medical researchers perform meta-analysis to assess the overall effectiveness of treatment across multiple clinical trials.

Choosing the Right Research Method

Selecting the appropriate research method is crucial for achieving valid and reliable results. Consider the following factors when deciding on a research approach:

• Research Objectives: Clearly define your goals and questions to guide method selection.
• Data Type: Determine whether you need quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods data.
• Resources: Evaluate available time, budget, and technology.
• Ethical Considerations: Ensure compliance with ethical standards in data collection and analysis.

By understanding these diverse research methodologies and strategically employing best practices, researchers can effectively communicate their findings and contribute to the broader field of knowledge.

Learn more: What is Research Design?

Conducting research involves a systematic and organized process that follows specific steps to ensure the collection of reliable and meaningful data. The research process typically consists of the following steps:

Step 1. Identify the Research Topic

Choose a research topic that interests you and aligns with your expertise and resources. Develop clear and focused research questions that you want to answer through your study.

Step 2. Review Existing Research

Conduct a thorough literature review to identify what research has already been done on your chosen topic. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge, identify gaps in the literature, and refine your research questions.

Step 3. Design the Research Methodology

Determine the appropriate research methodology that suits your research questions. Decide whether your study will be qualitative , quantitative , or a mix of both (mixed methods). Also, choose the data collection methods, such as surveys, interviews, experiments, observations, etc.

Step 4. Select the Sample and Participants

If your study involves human participants, decide on the sample size and selection criteria. Obtain ethical approval, if required, and ensure that participants’ rights and privacy are protected throughout the research process.

Step 5. Information Collection

Collect information and data based on your chosen research methodology. Qualitative research has more intellectual information, while quantitative research results are more data-oriented. Ensure that your data collection process is standardized and consistent to maintain the validity of the results.

Step 6. Data Analysis

Analyze the data you have collected using appropriate statistical or qualitative research methods . The type of analysis will depend on the nature of your data and research questions.

Step 7. Interpretation of Results

Interpret the findings of your data analysis. Relate the results to your research questions and consider how they contribute to the existing knowledge in the field.

Step 8. Draw Conclusions

Based on your interpretation of the results, draw meaningful conclusions that answer your research questions. Discuss the implications of your findings and how they align with the existing literature.

Step 9. Discuss Limitations

Acknowledge and discuss any limitations of your study. Addressing limitations demonstrates the validity and reliability of your research.

Step 10. Make Recommendations

If applicable, provide recommendations based on your research findings. These recommendations can be for future research, policy changes, or practical applications.

Step 11. Write the Research Report

Prepare a comprehensive research report detailing all aspects of your study, including the introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, and references.

Step 12. Peer Review and Revision

If you intend to publish your research, submit your report to peer-reviewed journals. Revise your research report based on the feedback received from reviewers.

Make sure to share your research findings with the broader community through conferences, seminars, or other appropriate channels, this will help contribute to the collective knowledge in your field of study.

Remember that conducting research is a dynamic process, and you may need to revisit and refine various steps as you progress. Good research requires attention to detail, critical thinking, and adherence to ethical principles to ensure the quality and validity of the study.

Learn more: What is Primary Market Research?

Best practices for conducting research remain rooted in the principles of rigor, transparency, and ethical considerations. Here are the essential best practices to follow when conducting research in 2023:

1. Research Design and Methodology

• Carefully select and justify the research design and methodology that aligns with your research questions and objectives.
• Ensure that the chosen methods are appropriate for the data you intend to collect and the type of analysis you plan to perform.
• Clearly document the research design and methodology to enhance the reproducibility and transparency of your study.

2. Ethical Considerations

• Obtain approval from relevant research ethics committees or institutional review boards, especially when involving human participants or sensitive data.
• Prioritize the protection of participants’ rights, privacy, and confidentiality throughout the research process.
• Provide informed consent to participants, ensuring they understand the study’s purpose, risks, and benefits.

3. Data Collection

• Ensure the reliability and validity of data collection instruments, such as surveys or interview protocols.
• Conduct pilot studies or pretests to identify and address any potential issues with data collection procedures.

4. Data Management and Analysis

• Implement robust data management practices to maintain the integrity and security of research data.
• Transparently document data analysis procedures, including software and statistical methods used.
• Use appropriate statistical techniques to analyze the data and avoid data manipulation or cherry-picking results.

5. Transparency and Open Science

• Embrace open science practices, such as pre-registration of research protocols and sharing data and code openly whenever possible.
• Clearly report all aspects of your research, including methods, results, and limitations, to enhance the reproducibility of your study.

6. Bias and Confounders

• Be aware of potential biases in the research process and take steps to minimize them.
• Consider and address potential confounding variables that could affect the validity of your results.

7. Peer Review

• Seek peer review from experts in your field before publishing or presenting your research findings.
• Be receptive to feedback and address any concerns raised by reviewers to improve the quality of your study.

8. Replicability and Generalizability

• Strive to make your research findings replicable, allowing other researchers to validate your results independently.
• Clearly state the limitations of your study and the extent to which the findings can be generalized to other populations or contexts.

9. Acknowledging Funding and Conflicts of Interest

• Disclose any funding sources and potential conflicts of interest that may influence your research or its outcomes.

10. Dissemination and Communication

• Effectively communicate your research findings to both academic and non-academic audiences using clear and accessible language.
• Share your research through reputable and open-access platforms to maximize its impact and reach.

By adhering to these best practices, researchers can ensure the integrity and value of their work, contributing to the advancement of knowledge and promoting trust in the research community.

Learn more: What is Consumer Research?

Enhance Your Research

Collect feedback and conduct research with IdeaScale’s award-winning software

Most Recent Blogs

Explore the latest innovation insights and trends with our recent blog posts.

Crafting a Bridge to Digital Success: The Digital Business Transformation Canvas

Blog , Guest Post , Innovation Stories

Who is More Creative – Men or Women? 753 Studies have the Answer

Thoughts and Key Takeaways After 1.5 Years Using AI in Problem Solving

Navigating the AI Agent Frontier: Opportunities and Risks

AI Takes Center Stage at Rutgers Business School with Google Partnership

2025’s Top CIO Priorities: Staying Secure, Smart, and Inclusive

From Chaos to Clarity: The Power of Structured Idea Management

Why Curiosity is Your Agency’s Secret Weapon

The Future of Innovation: Why Collaborative Tools Are Non-Negotiable

Elevate research and feedback with your ideascale community.

IdeaScale is an innovation management solution that inspires people to take action on their ideas. Your community’s ideas can change lives, your business and the world. Connect to the ideas that matter and start co-creating the future.

Copyright © 2024 IdeaScale

Privacy Overview

Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?

Affiliations.

• 1 Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
• 2 Digital Content Services, Operations, Elsevier Ltd., 125 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5AS, UK.
• 3 School of Nursing, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre, Room 2J20, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1; Section for Evidence-Based Practice, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, Bergen, P.O.Box 7030 N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
• 4 Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark; Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev & Gentofte, Kildegaardsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
• 5 Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000, Copenhagen F, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, Research Unit of Rheumatology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
• 6 Section for Evidence-Based Practice, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, Bergen, P.O.Box 7030 N-5020 Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: [email protected].
• PMID: 32979491
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.020

Objectives: There is considerable actual and potential waste in research. Evidence-based research ensures worthwhile and valuable research. The aim of this series, which this article introduces, is to describe the evidence-based research approach.

Study design and setting: In this first article of a three-article series, we introduce the evidence-based research approach. Evidence-based research is the use of prior research in a systematic and transparent way to inform a new study so that it is answering questions that matter in a valid, efficient, and accessible manner.

Results: We describe evidence-based research and provide an overview of the approach of systematically and transparently using previous research before starting a new study to justify and design the new study (article #2 in series) and-on study completion-place its results in the context with what is already known (article #3 in series).

Conclusion: This series introduces evidence-based research as an approach to minimize unnecessary and irrelevant clinical health research that is unscientific, wasteful, and unethical.

Keywords: Clinical health research; Clinical trials; Evidence synthesis; Evidence-based research; Medical ethics; Research ethics; Systematic review.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Publication types

• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
• Biomedical Research* / methods
• Biomedical Research* / organization & administration
• Clinical Trials as Topic / ethics
• Clinical Trials as Topic / methods
• Clinical Trials as Topic / organization & administration
• Ethics, Research
• Evidence-Based Medicine / methods*
• Needs Assessment
• Reproducibility of Results
• Research Design* / standards
• Research Design* / trends
• Systematic Reviews as Topic
• Treatment Outcome